SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Burnt Orange Nation

Postgame React: Texas Blows Out Missouri 41-7

The outcome was: Predictable? Last week Mack Brown and Texas won for the fourth time in five years against Oklahoma. This week they made it eleven for eleven in the week following OU -- for the second straight year, by throttling Missouri.

The Week After OU
Year Opponent Result
1998 Baylor W, 30-20
1999 #3 Nebraska W, 24-20
2000 @ Colorado W, 28-14
2001 @ Okie St W, 45-17
2002 @ #17 Kansas St W, 17-14
2003 @ Iowa State W, 40-19
2004 #24 Missouri W, 28-20
2005 #24 Colorado W, 42-17
2006 Baylor W, 63-31
2007 @ Iowa State W, 56-3
2008 #11 Missouri W, 57-31
2009 @ Missouri W, 41-7

I was informed the team's plane had a battery issue that had the team sprawled across the small Columbia airport until 3:00 a.m., but other than that, it was a great trip to Missouri. The offense was improved, the defense went four-for-four in knocking the opposing Big 12 quarterback out of the game, no one got injured, and the team cruised on the road against an outmatched opponent. After last week's nailbiter in Dallas, the comfotable win was a welcome one.

Star-divide

The Offensive MVP was: Colt McCoy. About damn time his name appears in this space. Texas' senior QB finished the game having completed 26 of his 31 passes for 269 yards and 3 TDs, picking apart a Missouri defense that looked woefully unprepared to face the Longhorns. Seriously, did Dave Steckel watch any tape of, say, the last 10 games Texas has played? That's Missouri's problem, I suppose, but given the way Steckel defended Texas in the first half, I wasn't at all surprised to see McCoy light up the score board in the first half.

Some credit is due to the Longhorns, as well -- Texas' approach offensively was a marked improvement from a week ago. Among the things I liked from Saturday night:

  • Improved commitment to running the football in the first half. Honestly, it's hard to evaluate completely the performance here. On the one hand, Texas seemed more committed to running the football this week and did so with reasonable success in the first half (17 carries for 75 yards at 5.0 per carry). On the other hand, Texas threw the ball 23 times in the first half -- more, in theory, than I wanted to see as the team recalibrates its offensive identity. But then on the other-other hand, the way Missouri was defending us, Greg Davis was wise to pass when/as much as he did. For now, I'll say that I'm encouraged but a smidge worried that the rebound passing effort will be mis-leveraged as an excuse to revert to the comfort zone of rushing-as-an-afterthought.
  • Tempering that concern was Mack Brown and Greg Davis' decision to go to the Jumbo package on multiple short distance-to-go situations. Recalling last week's disastrous playcalling on 3rd and 1 (sack, incompletion to Shipley, red zone interception), I was thrilled when on Texas' opening drive of the game the team lined up for 3rd and 2 with Cody Johnson in the backfield behind Lamarr Houston, a tight end, and Antwaan Cobb. On Texas' next drive, everyone in the universe knew the fake punt to Antwaan Bobino was coming, which is not to say it was a bad play call; given its simplicity and how well we execute the play, it's the functional equivalent of a power rush.
  • Side note: If an interested reader wants to take the time to go through the box scores of the last two seasons, I'd love to see charted out every Cody Johnson rush on 3rd and 4th down with 1-2 yards to go (including goal-to-go). My guess is that such a chart would show that he's never lost yardage, he averages about 3 yards a pop, and has been successful in picking up the first down or touchdown at a rate of about 80%. If that's right, not only should Texas be power rushing almost every time in such situations, but the coaches should commit on principle to "two shots to convert it" when the game situation doesn't mandate a conservative/protective approach. If my assumed conversion rates are about right, the extra first downs gained would add up to a substantial boost to the offense.
  • Until recently, it was really starting to look like winding up on my preseason "My Guys" list was something of a curse. Prior to the 2008 season, I singled out Lamarr Houston (uncharacteristic DUI), Deon Beasley (lost starting job), Malcolm Williams (barely used outside Lubbock), Sam Acho (a year early), and Michael Huey (disaster filling in for injured Tanner). Three games into this season, I was starting to fret with guilt about "My Guys, 2009" -- DJ Grant blew out his knee just one week after I posted the list, a seemingly distracted/disinterested Chykie Brown game up a smattering of big plays, and Fozzy Whittaker still couldn't get healthy enough to play. The way things were going, I was more than a little worried we'd lose Aaron Williams and Keenan Robinson to a UFO abduction; that, or kicking some bitches.

    There's no getting Grant back, but amongst the other four, the worm has turned: Chykie is living up to his potential, Williams and Robinson are alive and well, and -- perhaps most importantly -- Fozzy Whittaker has been healthy and on the field the past four games. He carried the ball 4 times for 38 yards and a score in his season debut against UTEP, dropped six points on Colorado in his 4th quarter cameo (1 rush, 12 yards, TD), picked up 85 yards on 18 carries (4 catches, 21 yards) as a starter against Oklahoma, and scored again as a starter this week versus Missouri (9 rushes, 36 yards / 3 catches for 18 yards).

    Four points on Healthy Fozzy's emergence:

    (1) To return to a point I've been making for over a year now, Fozzy's lateral quickness is especially valuable in our rushing scheme.

    (2) Not only are his quick feet and fluid hips valuable in helping him run, but it looks like there may be some cascade effect in Fozzy's cutback success helping our challenged offensive coordinator figure out how to make a run game work for the team. We'll see.

    (3) Missouri invited a Colt McCoy slaughtering, but even in a secondary role (just 9 rushes on the night) you could see that Whittaker is starting to trust his body more; a week ago, he doesn't score that touchdown at the pylon as he did Saturday night. If he can stay healthy for the rest of this year, as he finishes more runs and starts forgetting about the past two years of tenderness, I expect we'll see a smattering of dazzling plays and long scores -- he's not at all as fast as Jamaal Charles, but I like Whittaker in traffic a good bit more.
  • (4) If you're looking for a single factor about which to obsess over the rest of this season, you could do worse than the development of Fozzy -- both in terms of his own play on the field and, especially, Greg Davis' usage of him. More precisely, the key may be the development of the running game, generally -- lest my excitement confuse, I'm not suggesting Fozzy is some kind of singular savior; the several observations on the run game are meant to be read in concert, the big point being: While Texas needn't be (and is in fact incapable of being) an elite rushing team, there is a substantial amount of potential value to the team's title chances to be had just from committing to the ground game in the ways described. Systematically channeling our strength rushing to convert short yardage situations extends drives, reduces turnover risk, and opens play action opportunities. Committing to develop the usage of Fozzy Whittaker gives the rushing offense some real bite, improves opportunities for big plays on the ground, and, above all, also opens up play action while dictating how opposing defenses can play us.

    Colt McCoy certainly can be the superior quarterback that elevates Texas above the rest of this year's national title contenders... but it's fool's gold to believe that he will -- that he can -- without a legit rush attack. I don't have to tell you again about the worries as relate to approach, scheme and play calling, but if the 2009 story has an "it all comes together" happy ending, I'm convinced that it involves Texas supplementing its established foundation -- Will Muschamp's devastating, (shamefucomically) underrated defense -- with a substantially more robust offensive attack than either Alabama or Florida appear likely to develop. That is to say, I struggle seeing either Alabama or Florida developing an elite passing offense over the rest of the season, while I'm certain it is within Texas' capabilities. But, to the point at hand, that is also to say I'm certain that Texas will be not the slightest bit advantaged offensively if Colt McCoy isn't succeeding as the director of an offense whose rushing game affects what linebackers and safeties are able to do.

    While Texas realistically can emerge from the regular season unscathed without these developments, even if they do, awaiting them in Pasadena will be a defense every bit as good as their own. Without a rushing game that extends drives and opens the field for McCoy, the results won't be pretty. With them... I like our chances.
  • Moving on, it was great seeing Malcolm Williams involved in the game plan, though one wonders whether he's just not a natural receiver. Frankly, that's of greater relevance to his Sunday future than the present: he's plenty capable of being a capable, useful player in our offense. We need to keep putting the ball in his hands and giving him opportunities to break big ones.
  • On a related note, it looks like I can finally stop carping about moving Shipley out to Split End. For both his and Malcolm's sake, I like Shipley's full-time return to the slot.
  • Marquise Goodwin wasn't a huge factor in the box score, but he wasn't silent on the field. He helped open things up and really impressed me with his blocking. We've missed that from Quan.
  • I've not yet sat down for a second viewing of the game, so my notes on the O-Line are thin and I'm looking forward to Burnt In NY's excellent In The Trenches post. On first impression, the unit appeared to display the same well-documented strengths and weaknesses we've discussed all year and I'll mostly leave it at that. Michael Huey looked healthy and good; Charlie Tanner looked healthy and not so good.

The offensive Offensive LVP was: Nah. Let's take a week off from negativity and see how things go in Stillwater. 

The Defensive MVP was: Will Muschamp. The defense was once again dominant, as both Will Muschamp and his players are making it look easy in year two through the conference. There were a couple issues defending receiver screens and a series of poor linebacking play that got Rod Muckelroy sidelined for some coaching, but Missouri was mostly suffocated all night long.

Muschamp gets the official nod tonight in recognition of the utter beauty of his preparation and scheming. The Texas defense was more than ready for everything Missouri wanted to do, and the way Muschamp deftly took it all away it often looked like we knew before the snap which play the Tigers were going to run. There were great rush blitzes, smart zones, consistently correct alignments -- the whole works.

The offensive Defensive LVP was: The Linebackers. In the first half, Muck was taking himself out of position with undisciplined over-aggression, while Keenan was tardy on several coverage assignments. At one point, Muschamp pulled Muckelroy out of the game for Dustin Earnest and, I assume, chewed his ass out. He was fine the rest of the game. I have nothing at all negative else to say. Even the much-maligned Deon Beasley has grabbed his lunch pail, donned a blue collar, and is earning playing time. Love it.

Oklahoma State Fear Factor: 10 out of 10. (5) is the baseline. +5 for this is that game with a big red circle around it.

Heading into next week I feel: Anxious. I'm exhausted from travel and don't have any energy left to write more about OSU right now, but suffice it to say that it increasingly looks like the regular season comes down to Saturday night. I won't rest easy until Texas leaves Stillwater. 

0 recs  |  31 comments

Comments

This will really chap your hide!

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/notebook?page=notebook/onthemark098

Linky no worky

Link

Worked that time thanks.

“No more Potts”. Classy move, Tech fan.

Texas-Florida

No matter what anyone’s saying right now, if Texas and Florida run the table to meet in Pasadena, there won’t be anyone talking about the season being a flop. It’ll be as anticipated a title game showdown as the BCS has seen.

I’m praying for it. (Mostly for Texas.)

Why can’t Iowa pass us if they win out? I’m slightly nervous.

Are you really praying or is this a hat tip to Colt and Tim Tebow?

Iowa won’t pass Texas if everyone wins out because the pollsters will keep Texas ahead of them, and the computer rankings, by the time all is said and done, won’t be a big enough factor to override that.

Furthermore...

Iowa’s Computer score is inflated right now because they have 8 wins when everyone else has 7.

Just wait til we have 13 wins and they just have 12.

Most of the Big 10 is comparable to our North division. And there is no love for the Big 10 in the national media. I do not worry about Iowa jumping Texas unless we lose.

From the games I’ve watched, TCU is a better team than Iowa. They deserve some more recognition. Of course I say that and they will do a complete nose dive this weekend…

Thid Bullet Point

Hell freaking yes. This was probably my greatest joy of the game, was to finally see the jumbo lined up outside of the goal line.

As to Cody Johnson, he has lost yardage on 3 carries in 2008, and zero in 2009 (though he may have made zero several times).

Those three lost yardage carries:
1. UTEP 2008 – 4th Quarter; 9ish minutes left to play; On our 48 Yard Line – On his 3rd out of 4 in a row runs, on 1st and 10, Cody lost a single yard. His two previous runs were for 7 yards a piece, his next run was for 4 yards. This was obviously not a jumbo set situation

2. CU 2008 – 2nd Quarter; 5ish minutes left; on our own 38 – On the first play of the possession (1st and 10), Cody ran for negative 2 yards. This was also not a jumbo set.

3. Ohio State 2009 – 3rd Quarter, opening drive, on OSU’s 46 – 3rd and 1, Cody ran for negative 1 yard. Possibly jumbo here, but I dont think so, as we hardly ran it outside of the goal line.

That, friends, is it. Over 112 carries.

Forgot to post the scores at the time

1. 42-13 Texas
2. 21-0 Texas
3. 6-3 tOSU

My man-crush is Irby, but Cody does kinda make me wanna cheat on him while he’s not playin’. I’m just sayin’.

Not the first time this comment has been made

… but did we really knock Taylor Potts out of the game when we played Tech?

No, he was the only QB that played against us that day.

So then we’re 3/4

Dang

I could’ve sworn he went out for a series after the sack. I guess it was just that the sack was on 4th down. The box score doesn’t show any other passers for Tech. Dang.

I thought he did, too. Even though the concussion was registered in the New Mexico game (I believe), you have to wonder if Kindle’s hit didn’t start the dominoes for that concussion… That was some hit.

I think Hawkin’s just got benched because he threw an INT

Dont cloud our statistics with facts!

But yes Hawkin’s was completely healthy, however, getting the opposing QB benched due to our defensive performance may even be more impressive.

LOL. Good point.

In my line of work, we say “you can torture the data enough to make it say whatever you like”. So I guess we could say all 4 Big 12 QB’s we’ve faced are no longer starting. And that wouldn’t be a lie.

So then we’re 2/4

I really liked seeing Fozzy cut through to find the holes

and cut back. but my favorite run was shipley after the catch at the beginning of the game. A thing of beauty in traffic

Moving Shipley back to the slot is going to pay dividends

again… and again… and again…

Fun read...

Thanks!

I got to agree with you on your excitement on Fozzy. He’s really separated himself from the other backs. He even makes yards in the first half.

The only negatives I see are that Williams is always about to fumble the ball and Dan Buckner hadn’t broken out like I thought. He doesn’t seem to find the seams and needs to work on his blocking.

What did you think of that Chiles touchdown? I see that as a result of the DB being dumbfounded because he just goes for the 1 yard screen. I didn’t see a make a move or seem that fast. I just don’t see Chiles as a receiver.

Buckner is a sophomore. Patience my young paduwan!

Chiles ran straight at the DB, tied him up, and then burst off to make separation.

Smart move on his part – he’s big and physical enough, and when he doesn’t have to dodge, he’s got great acceleration.

Tip of the hat to CoJo

I think he had another one of his runs where he gets hit at the LOS and pushes a couple of linebackers back 4-5 yards to make a solid gain.

He had a similar run against OU, and it’s just fantastic to see.

Cody does look a lot bigger when he is carrying 5-6 players on his back and moving forward!
Dug a little deeper on the COJO numbers...

As BiC noted, he’s been stopped for a loss 3 times total, and he’s been stopped for no gain 8 times TOTAL.

Cody has carried the ball with less than 3 yards needed for a 1st down on 22 occasions. he has faced less than 3 yards and Goal to go on 18 occasions. Of those opportunities, COJO has converted 15/22 (68%) of 1st Downs, and 14/18 (77%) of TD’s.

In situations calling for 2 or less yards, Cody Johnson converts 72.5%, is tackled for a loss 2.5%, and is held for no gain 12.5% of the time.

Not that nervous

Maybe I’m just being naive but in my humble opinion in which I honestly don’t know as much about football as most of the posters on here. I do not think Texas will have trouble beyond OK state being up for the game for a few drives. I could be wrong but I expect Texas will cruise during the second half. I have seen absolutely every snap (except ppv games) played by a Texas team for the last 9 yrs. and they honestly have not had this much talent, discipline, speed, and nose for the football on defense in that time period.

I also know that the best thing this offense could have done was move and insert the players it did this week. It will open up things for everyone as long as there is a commitment to at least trying to run the football every once in a while with some sort of creative play calling.

OK state does not have the talent we have. I know this is the case with about 95% of the teams we play and some still find a way to make a game of it but this game has got Texas’ attention. I’m gonna call it 41-24. But then again I know absolutely nothing and could be completely wrong.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.