So there were the Horns, having a 21-0 lead on the road, with the ball and all the momentum. Three plays later, Texas comes up a yard short and has to punt. Missouri then takes the ball down the field with a series of running plays, eventually scoring a touchdown when Missouri's offensive formation resulted in Chykie Brown having 1 on 1 coverage of Jared Perry. An excellent throw by Gabbert yielded 6 for the Tigers. OK, it's 21-7, and the offense had looked weak again on the previous series. In days gone by, the track meet would be on, with the opposing offense marching up and down the field and the Texas offense would have had to keep pace. Think Texas Tech 2007. But not in 2009. Not with Will Muschamp as defensive coordinator. First the offense did their part, overcoming a dropped pass by Malcolm Williams with a brilliantly executed screen to Fozzy Whittaker and then once again using Marquise Goodwin as a decoy to free Shipley for a TD pass. Then it was back to the defense, and, as we fans have become almost spoiled to experience this season, came the MUSCHAMP ADJUSTMENT.
Exactly as I planned, men, exactly as I planned!
As the offense, and ergo the offensive line, finally found itself in the first half, I decided to focus the majority of this week's column on the defense. And the epitome of the defensive effort in this game was a subtle but critical change in defensive strategy that largely shut down the MU running game. As an example of many such adjustments Muschamp has made over the past 19 games for Texas, I'll analyze it in detail along with a few comments about the offense after the jump.

In one drive, Missouri outrushes Texas' four previous opponents combined.
So what happened? Missouri got an extra "tight end" on the field in the form of starting left tackle Elvis Fisher (72). Fisher was replaced by backup center J.T. Beasley (67). This effectively put six offensive linemen on the field with three wide receivers still to spread the field. They lined up Denario Alexander in the slot to the opposite side of the two tackles, whilch pulled Earl Thomas to that side of the field. At the same time, Texas lined up Kheeston Randall and Lamarr Alexander in gaps 1 (between the center and guard) or 2 (over the guard) (see purple circles in diagram below). During the drive, Missouri shifted their strong side with Elvis Fisher as tight end. The coupling of these formations left Texas in an unbalanced defense with their arguably four best defensive players (circled in yellow) on one side of the field and allowed Missouri to exploit mismatches on the opposite (strong side)
On the drive, Missouri mostly ran away from Kindle and pulled either guard Kurtis Gregory (78) or tackles Dan Hoch or J.T. Beasley to provide extra blockers at the point of attack. No play epitomized Missouri's success, and the source of it, more than Derrick Washington's 13 yard run for a first down to the Texas 14 yard-line with about 8 minutes left in the first half. The formation allowed MU to double team Sam Acho (81), put a tackle on Rodderick Muckelroy (38), let center Tim Barnes (62) push Kheeston Randall out of the play and pull J.T. Beasley (67) to block Keenan Robinson (1). Sergio Kindle is never blocked on the play.
Note how the play looks defended because of Randall's penetration and Robinson flying in to fill the gap behind him. Instead (see below), because of the mismatches on Acho and Muckelroy, Washington cuts inside Randall into a huge hole created by Dan Hoch (77) doing a niceuncalled infant grip on Sam Acho (purple circle) and Kurtis Gregory getting off the initial block on Acho to double team Robinson. Blake Gideon, for some reason is late getting over and has to take a deep angle on Washington to avoid giving up a TD.
So the next series, Muschamp ADJUSTS by essentially shifting to a 3-4 alignment, with Randall at the nose (0 technique) and Kindle as an extra linebacker. Houston is now the strongside defensive end playing over the 4 or 5 gaps, with no one outside him. Perhaps anticipating Muschamp's adjustment, Pinkel changes to a 20 personnel, with an extra back, Matt Davis (35) in the backfield, and two WR to either side. The only (apparent) advantage MU has in this formation is the ability to double team Randall in the middle.
Note the more balanced distribution of Texas best players (although part of this is the placement of Denario Alexander in the slot opposte the tight end, which puts Earl Thomas behind Kindle).
The example play from this ultimately ill-fated drive is on second down, a sweep with MU's speed back De'Vion Moore (26). The idea is for Alexander to crack back on Kindle and for Davis (35) to block upfield on Earl Thomas, and for Dan Hoch (77) to seal Lamarr Houston. As you might suspect, all these matchups favor Texas, especially now that Kindle is not playing DE and can turn to face Alexander's block rather than being hit from the side.
The result? Houston blows by Hoch like Hurricane Katrina, Randall ties up three (!) MU blockers in the middle (purple circle). Kindle abuses Alexander, and Thomas just runs by Matt Davis for a joint collision and a loss of a yard. All three plays on the drive were disrupted by Houston, who could no longer be double-teamed. On every play, Randall stood up Missouri's double teams, freeing Acho and Houston and Robinson to fill gaps or harass Gabbert. In retrospect, one wonders what Pinkel was thinking in his playcalling and why he got away from the 3-tackle offensive line formation that produced the success on the previous drive. Perhaps, because of the poor field position and only 1:45 left in the half, he thought he needed a more pass-friendly formation but regardless, Muschamp's adjustments shifted the advantage from Missouri to Texas, with immediate results.
Missouri is pinned inside their 10, decides to rugby kick, and Curtis Brown blocks the punt, Malcolm Williams recovers, and it's Texas 35-7. Game. Set. Match.
The Screen Game
Now that Fozzy Whittaker is the #1 RB and is playing well on all 3 downs, including pass blocking, Texas has added the screen to their arsenal in a big way. This puts new expectations for the offensive line, and over the past three games, we've learned a bit about how successful these screens are likely to be. Against Missouri, the Horns ran two screens. One went for 17 yards, following excellent downfield blocks by Michael Huey and Chris Hall, and a solid block against a defender chasing from the rear by Charlie Tanner. The other screen went for one yard even though it was equally well set up and timed because Charlie "Tunnel Vision" Tanner didn't see the nearest and most threatening defender, who sliced in behind the blocking to stop Whittaker. Against Oklahoma, the screen was moderately successful (7 yards), but again, defenders sliced in behind Tanner to make the tackle. Texas also ran a screen against Colorado out of the flex TE formation, but Dan Buckner's missed block caused the play to be stopped for a minimal gain.
Prognosis: The screen pass to Whittaker could become an excellent component of the newly diversified Texas offense, but perhaps it needs to be run to the right behind Michael Huey instead of to the left behind Tanner.
Offensive Line Report
After six games, the "sick child" of the 2009 Longhorns is officially the offensive line. It is the leading cause of sleepless nights for fans and lost thumbnails for Colt McCoy. Against Missouri, they earned these grades.
Adam Ulatoski A- An absolute rock in the run game, number 74 is still showing vulnerability to bull rushes followed by quick inside moves from defensive ends in the passing game.
Charlie Tanner B+ Tanner seems to have gotten over the hurdle of picking up blitzes but still struggles at times with picking out the right defender to block on downfield runs and screens (see above).
Chris Hall B- Struggled with his snapping all night - Colt made him look good with a couple of athletic grabs, but one bad snap led to a sack. Chris still struggles with the cut blocking needed for effective double teams in the Horns' zone blocking schemes. Nevertheless, his blocking calls are usually on and the whole line plays better when Hall, as opposed to David Snow, is in at center.
Michael Huey A- Slowed by a high ankle sprain since the ULM game, Huey was replaced by David Snow after a miserable Colorado game, but came back in to start and play well in the second half against Oklahoma. Huey blocked magnificently on several running plays and was solid in pass protection except for one play where Terrell Rosonno (I believe it was) blew him 5 yards backward. Huey should become stronger as his ankle continues to heal.
Kyle Hix C Texas' largest lineman seems to get physically dominated early in every game, and it's not clear why. Perhaps being matched up against future NFLers Gerald McCoy and Jeremy Beal of OU is too much for Hix, but redshirt freshman Aldon Smith of Missouri? His early failures can make Colt have a short clock in his head before he feels like he has to throw, which can lead to an inefficient passing offense and an over-reliance on short looks to Jordan Shipley. The domino effect of Hix being dominated early in the game may even affect the playcalling, although Greg Davis' eclectic portfolio prevents any real analysis. But early game failures, which fortunately had no impact on the outcome in this game, start sending the message about what you can't do rather than what you can.
Greg Smith Saga
The player who easily leads the team in fan groans over the past two seasons is Greg Smith, an offensive lineman converted from a high school TE to a guard and then back to a TE. Known misaffectionately on the site as the "Extra Blocking Surface" or EBS, Smith is now the favorite son of Greg Davis, who lauded what having Smith enabled the Horns to do once again on his "From the Film Room" report (now up on page 2 videos on the main page of MB-TF). Greg had a typical game against Missouri: decent but somewhat inconsistent run-blocking, and a presence that allowed Texas to block well on zone read and counter plays in the first series. He also caught the only ball thrown to him, and seems to have improved speed in escaping the desultory linebacker usually assigned to him. In some big game in the future, Smith will make a couple of key first down catches.
On the other hand, Smith is still a liability in pass protection. Against the Tigers, he was manhandled by Aldon Smith, on one play that led to one of Colt's two sacks on the day. In some big game in the future, Smith will get overwhelmed again leading to pressure or a sack on McCoy and a turnover.
That's a risk the Horns are just going to have to take, because Smith's presence on the field shifts the blocking schemes to allow the offensive line to have two initial double teams up front, a greater likelihood of the backdoor cut for Whittaker, and greater opportunities in the zone read. It is clear that the Horns want to be able to run the ball up to 5-6 plays in a row, and that's just not possible without a true TE on the field.
The Man in the Middle
Kheestion Randall and Ben Alexander have been incredibly pleasant surprises this year at defensive tackle (see the section above on the benefits of putting Kheeston Randall at the nose. Kheeston has emerged as the clear starter over Alexander in the last two weeks, largely because he has become the first DT since perhaps Frank Okam who is big and strong enough to take on two gaps. That is he lines up in the nose or directly in front of the center and stands him up, and then shifts to the right or left if a running back tries to come through either hole. Randall has shown outstanding quickness on slants, and has gotten close enough to the opposing QB enough times to draw 3 personal foul roughing the QB penalties. Randall is just a sophomore, and if he keeps developing, he could remove worry about the center of the Texas defence and free playmakers like Eddie Jones, Alex Okafor, and Reggie Wilson for the next two years.
0 recs | 37 comments
Terrific report
Exceptionally informative
Peter Bean - October 27, 2009
Thanks!
I thought it was time to analyze the defense a bit.
burnt in ny - October 27, 2009
"As the offense, and ergo the offensive line, finally found itself in the first half"
Shouldn’t it be that the OL found itself and ergo the O found itself? That is, the offense is doing much better because the OL is doing much better, right?
Going from 4 wide to 3 wide plus a TE has really worked out well, hasn’t it?
Would you agree that the OL is doing better because there is now usually a TE playing and that TE, Greg Smith, is doing a good job of blocking?
I noticed that Greg was often assigned the responsibility of blocking the Tigers hotshot DE all by himself. This is unusual, since the OT usually the primary blocker of the DE. Why was Smith assigned this task?
Kafka - October 27, 2009
The TE situation seems to have solved some problems
One of the biggest issues we were dealing with this season (IMO) was the fact that we couldn’t run the ball with 4-wide, but when we marched Smith out there, we would only run, so it wasn’t difficult for a defense to figure out what we were doing and key on it. I’m never going to want to see passes going to Smith with the talent that we have elsewhere in the receiving game, but I loved the fact that he is now a part of it. He is a decent run blocker (much better than Buckner) and if he keeps working on his hands and speed, he can keep doing what he did in the OU and MU games: pick up some easy yards when the defense believes they don’t need to cover him. And if the defense is respecting the pass when he is in the game, then it is time to unleash the Fozzy monster.
circa1015 - October 27, 2009
Smith has way better hands than Malcolm
I don’t see any problems with Smith’s hands. I also don’t think he is slow for a TE.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
His hands were the primary cause of many groans last year
But he’s been very reliable in the few receiving opportunities he’s had this year, yes. I think the coaches are wisely being quite judicious with the passes they send his way. He’s definitely getting to where he’s no longer a guy defenses needn’t even bother to cover, and really, the limited passes he’s receiving are going to be enough to keep defenses honest. That’s what I like to see.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
Last season
Greg converted from interior OL to TE after Irby’s injury (i.e. after the Rice game). It takes a while to make that transition.
I don’t actually remember many passes thrown in his direction last season. From the OU game on, UT went with 4 WRs. How many passes did he drop in games last season?
The groans don’t mean much because of the echo chamber effect. Most of the people commenting on these boards don’t know much about football.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
I remember a handful of Greg Smith drops. I think most are aware that he had to transition from OL, although IIRC he played tight end before transitioning to OL in the first place, so you’d think the transition might have been a bit smoother.
Whatever the case, he has been doing his job, for the most part. Good for him. The improved receiving has been a welcome surprise, even he’s not targeted often.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
Two passes caught last season
I would bet good money that he did not drop 5 passes last season. He only caught two passes the whole season and I am relatively certain that he did not drop more passes than he caught.
I think, for some reason, that people are confusing Greg’s performnace last season with Pete Ullman’s peformance.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
Much to my dismay, my film room lacks reels of the entire 2008 season
But I do think he actually dropped more than two passes.
Anyone have a read on this, so Kafka and I aren’t left guessimating?
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
It is in the mack brown archives I think
For each game,there is a play by play description. You can “find” a player’s name to see when he was thrown to and whether he caught the ball.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
I dunno, that sounds like a lot of work
I’d much rather throw more and more feces against the wall, and hope there’s some suction involved. Lil help, please?
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
Wasnt it in Colorado last year
Where he volleyballed up two passes, one which was a pick and another a near pick?
I could be misremembering, but I am fairly certain he set up at least one pick in the limited number of looks thrown at him, which is a main reason for groans about passes going his way.
BoddickerIsClutch - October 27, 2009
I think I was thinking of Ullman...
BoddickerIsClutch - October 27, 2009
iirc
..there was the pivotal one against tech.
vy til i die - October 28, 2009
True, he hasn't had any catching issues in games
But the kid is definitely slow for a pass-catching TE. No doubt he is quick enough to attack holes underneath (which he is doing a good job of), but I can’t see him attacking the middle of the field quite yet. If he just continues to sit in the flats when we do PA rollout until he gets a little quicker I think that this little wrinkle opens our offense up a lot.
circa1015 - October 27, 2009
Relatively slow?
What is his 40 time? What is the average 40 time for a Big 12 TE who can block well (let’s exclude guys like Buckner who are actually WRs)?
Mack lists Greg at 6’ 4.5" and 260 pounds. When I watch Greg run, he looks like he moves pretty well for such a big guy.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
I'd bet money that he's faster than Neal Tweedie, for example
The guy was never a speed demon, but even with all the weight gain since high school, it’s worth mentioning that he was a letterman as a sprinter in track.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
I did not know that
What event? Rivals or Scout listed him at 4.57 in the 40 when he was 230 pounds. He is a lot bigger now but I’m guessing he is probably still good for maybe 4.8 in the 40.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
100m and 200m, I believe.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
Following up:
Completely and shamelessly ripped off of MBTF.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
Unusual combination
Not too many guys run sprints, long jump, and do the weight events (shot put and discus). Kind of amazing.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
And then you top that off with great soccer and basketball talents, apparently
I don’t know anything about Montgomery HS, but even if it’s a pretty small school, a guy would still probably have to be a great all-around athlete to do that well in such a diverse range.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
It's a 4-A school
so there’s pressure to specialize unless you are a great all-around athlete, as he obviously was in that setting.
whills - October 27, 2009
Well
I acually played with greg in high school, and contrary to the beliefs of a lot of you he actually is a very good runner. His senior year he helped set a school and district record in the 4×100 and the 4×200 meter relays, and his 40 was between a 4.5 and a 4.6 when he left for Texas. Keep in mind he also has a fairly good vertical and is 6’5" and his attitude was always more of a hard nosed runner after the catch rather than trying to outrun someone. He is about 30 pounds heavier than he was then, but i would be willing to bet he could still clock a 4.7 or better. No-one has seen him get a chance to break one loose for a big run or run a deep route because the opportunity has not been given to him yet.
timmieboy - November 13, 2009
Great work...
But burnt in ny, the last two graphics show 12 players on the field for Mizzou, which confuses me as to what their alignment actually was. Do you think you could edit that and clarify what Pinkel’s adjustment was? (My assumption is they dropped the extra lineman/TE.)
TXinDC - October 27, 2009
That would explain their ability to run the ball during that one drive...
40AS - October 27, 2009
the graphics are fixed
I had an extra tight end that didn’t affect the action end of the play. Sorry
burnt in ny - October 27, 2009
So I guess that settles it
Muschamp for Heisman?
SuperBentley - October 27, 2009
A real twelfth man.
Not some schlub in a pretend military costume.
burntorangehorn - October 27, 2009
"It all began with an errant snap"
The above is a quote from the play by play man.
On that sack, the center made a snap that was high and to Colt’s right. Colt caught it but was forced to go to his right some and then spun around to end up about 5 yards deeper than when he started. This gave the Tiger DE an angle to get to Colt (because Colt was deeper than usual pocket because of the errant snap). Even then Colt was able to evade the DE by stepping up but another Tiger defender awaited him when Colt stepped up into the pocket.
If that is the only example of poor pass blocking vs Mizzou by Greg Smith that you can find, Greg did pretty well pass blocking.
He also did a good job of run blocking in the game. He understands zone blocking and is able to help OTs get into ther blocks and then seek another target. He is good at maintaining contact on the block.
Kafka - October 27, 2009
Hix also wiffed on a QB Draw
I just watched the game again. Hix pulled down and was to lead Colt through but totally aired as his guy makes a tackle for no gain. Poor guy, it just happened to be a perfect camera angle and made the replays.
orangetower - October 27, 2009
Great stuff, BNY
The freshman defensive to whom you were referring is Aldon Smith, who is actually quite a stud, in my opinion. He’s extremely physically gifted — strong and fast, and I think he’s going to be an All-Conference type of player by the time he’s done. In fact, I’m glad that Longhorns don’t have to face him against for some time, unless Missouri somehow makes a Big 12 championship game appearance. He’s also a redshirt freshman and was a stand out in high school, playing tight end for his team as well. Just FYI. I went ahead and made those corrections.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - October 27, 2009
Thanks GBR
I enjoyed your anatomy of success piece a lot as well
burnt in ny - October 27, 2009
Wow...
What a great piece. Thanks.
So I guess Trey Allen didn’t play.
pfc - October 27, 2009
I'm sure he played in the second half
but not when the game was on the line. I think Allen was listed as an OR because the coaches weren’t sure how well Huey’s ankle would hold up.
burnt in ny - October 27, 2009
So glad you picked these series as a topic
I’ve been thinking about this very series since Saturday night.
Pinkel made a great adjustment and ate Boom’s lunch with it. But Boom being Boom, lunch is all Pinkel got. Boom’s re-adjustment was the absolute key to the easy victory. I’ve watched Muschamp for a long, long time now and I’ve just come to expect this level of chess-mastery from him. Moving his playmakers around to exploit the other team’s weakness is what he does best.
beast in bama - October 27, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.