July 30 2009 - In a pre-season fanpost, I expressed the following concern for the upcoming season
As evidenced in last year's games against Oklahoma State and Ohio State, Texas's defense, which is increasingly designed to emphasize speed and quickness in order to match up with spread offenses, is vulnerable to power rushing attacks.
Numerous pre-season posts expressed anxiety about Texas' defensive tackles behind Lamarr Houston, who was an unknown commodity himself, such as perceived journeyman Ben Alexander and green redshirt sophomore Kheeston Randall. Visions of helpless collapses against power running teams in critical games filled everyone's heads. 2009 could be the year of Motown's Lamarr and the Space-Eaters against the blitzkriegs of Chris Brown, Kendall Hunter, Christine Michael, Tim Tebow, or Mark Ingram. The Horns might even have to use, gasp!, true freshmen Calvin Howell and Derek Johnson. The call went out by anxious UT fans for anyone, anyone to step up.
The Space Eaters - Ben Alexander (92) and Kheeston Randall (91)
Sure, UT could win 10 and maybe even make a BCS bowl (little did we know that there might be as many as 6 undefeated teams after 9 weeks in the 2009 season), but if it was the 2009 mythical national championship the Horns wanted, these guys had to step up.
Jimmy Hoffa, from the grave, "I need some nasty, beefy guys up front, and not ya cousin Guido. Whatevah it takes, capisce?!"
November 1, 2009. Basking in the glow of 41-14, the report is in: The call was ANSWERED!
For the details and more on the offensive line, Will Muschamp, and other tidbits, make the jump!

The Evolution of the Defensive Tackles: Space Eaters to Gap Monsters
No doubt, the Cowboys thought they could build on last year''s success and overpower the spread-ready Texas D. From the first offensive play, Oklahoma State's strategy was clear. Double the strongside DE (Acho or Kindle) with a tackle (Russell Okung or Brady Bond) and tight end Wilson Youman. Let Lamarr Houston penetrate into the play and have Keith Toston cut back behind a double team from guard Noah Franklin and center Andrew Lewis on the presumed sacrificial Kheeston Randall. Randall holds position with his shoulders underneath Lewis, and then when Franklin leaves to block Rodderick Muckelroy, he reaches out and slaps the ball out of Toston's hands, luckily recovered by Oklahoma State. OK, not exactly chopped liver, but it's one play.
On the first drive, powered largely by Zac Robinson's scrambling and a couple of trick plays, OSU ran some variation of the inside power run at Kheeston Randall 6 times. In the half they tried it 8 times The result: gains of 2, 2, 3, 1, 3, 4, 5, and 3 yards. That's a 3.8 ypc average if you're calculating at home. Not exactly 2008, when the Pokes averaged over 6 yards per carry. On all six runs, either Randall or Houston was able to slide off their block into the gap chosen by Toston, or were able to tie up two offensive linemen without losing ground for long enough to let Keenan Robinson or Roddrick Muckelroy make the tackle.
Even more interestingly, on the second drive, OSU abandoned the inside run almost completely (only two more inside runs the rest of the half) and instead began to attack Texas' corners. In the next 7 plays, 3 before and 4 after Jordan Shipley's fumbled punt, and ending the dropped fourth down pass in the end zone by Hubert Anyiam, OSU ran speed options to the outside or passed. They did not make a first down on either drive, and both Houston and Randall had QB pressures. Indeed, for most of the game the primary pressure on Zac Robinson was from either Houston or Randall.
This is worth taking a moment to appreciate. The play of the Longhorn defensive tackles, perceived to be a weakness at the beginning of the season by the fans and clearly also by Mike Gundy (otherwise why call 6 inside runs?) so completely defeats the OSU power running game that the Cowboys have to go to Game Plan B after the first drive. This shift in offensive philosophy eventually leaves Robinson vulnerable to the Texas secondary and perhaps provided the key to the blowout. While the Houtson-Randall-Alexander trifecta may not be composed of the best individual defensive tackles in the Big 12, they are good enough to stop the best power running team on the schedule without altering the defensive formation or changing personnel.
34 or 43: Which is the Magic Number?
The average fan is often aware of offensive formations (Wildhorn vs. empty set, etc.) but oblivious to details in defensive formations. Texas features a "Buck" package with Sergio Kindle as the "Buck" linebacker who can put a hand on the ground as a defensive end (to make a 4-3 alignment) or line up as a linebacker (to create a 3-4). The 3-4 alignment allows Will Muschamp to move Kindle around and create confusion in the blocking scheme. The success of the 3-4 alignment depends heavily on Texas having a strong presence at the nose, and Kheeston Randall filled that bill pretty well. A 3-4 defense is strongest against the pass because of the flexibility and uncertainty it creates for the offense in choosing routes and pass-blocking assignments. The 4-3 has the greatest potential against the run because the defensive tackles can take just one gap and penetrate and the linebackers are more protected.
In the Oklahoma State game, Texas switched regularly between the two alignments, and with largely the same personnel on the field. Although both fronts played well, there was a striking difference in OSU's performance against the two that highlights their strengths and weaknesses. Oklahoma State ran (not counting QB scrambles) against the 4-3 front 5 times in the first four drives, gaining 3 total yards (0.6 ypc). They ran against the 3-4 front 9 times, gaining 45 yards (5 ypc), with two runs accounting for 20 of the 45, including a 13 yard "jet sweep" by Travis Miller. On the other hand, Robinson passed against the 4-3 alignment 8 times, going 4-7 for 31 yards and an added 5 yard scramble (4.5 yards per play). Against the 3-4 front, Robinson threw five incompletions and had one scramble for 5 yards (0.8 yards per play). By the second quarter, Robinson was checking in and out of running plays to try to avoid running against the 4-3. Eventually, that caught up with him as he checked out of a run on 3rd and 2 from the Texas 30, only to throw the pick six to Curtis Brown.
The moral of these stats is that there will be a little cat and mouse game every week with opposing offenses trying to avoid running against the 4-3 and passing against the 3-4. The dominance of each defensive front against the offense it is designed to stop allows Texas to play against the offensive tendency, such as to expect a playaction pass on first down against its 4-3 or expect a run against its 3-4. Reducing an offense's playbook by half is a powerful defensive weapon.
Muschamp, You Wily Fox, You
Muschamp, the fox, playing with the mind of Zac Robinson. No chance, mouse: 41-14!
In going back over my notes and studying the tactics of both teams' playcalling, I'm convinced (without proof of course) that Muschamp baited Zac Robinson into Earl Thomas' interception. One of the great things about spread offenses is that receivers' routes are dictated by coverage, which allows the receiver to exploit the right seam or gap in the defense. However, I think that one of the reasons Texas' offense is struggling as much as it has this year is because defenses have now learned what choices receivers and QB's tend to make against particular formations. Defenses can now "show" one formation, know what choice a QB will make, and then run someone to that spot to jump the route. Against OSU, Earl Thomas began to run with the slot receiver, likely knowing that if he went with the receiver, Robinson would make the read to throw to the receiver running underneath to the area Thomas vacated. Knowing that, Earl released his man to Gideon deep and jumped the underneath route. If a defense gets to the point of responding to an offense's read rather than the actual player movements, then the offense will suffer the fate of the poor mouse in the photo, especially since there's no hole in the snow for an offense to hide.
Jekyll and Hyde, Version 2009.8
The offensive line that is. Frankly, I'm tired of analyzing the line's play because it's the same infuriating play every week. Any given individual along the line makes 3 great plays, 3 okay plays, and one really bad play. Against OSU, it was MOS. Chris Hall lets the defender get underneath him and thus enough penetration to trip Colt McCoy for a first down on 3rd and 2 in the red zone (Texas 3-0 instead of 7-0). Adam Ulatoski takes the wrong pass rusher and Colt takes a sack (end of drive). Charlie Tanner turns his head to the left and a blitzing LB goes by him to his right - sack and end of drive.
The good news is that, for the first time in three games, the OL was not physically overmatched at any time. The bad news is that this means it's all mental and after 140 collective starts or whatever it is, there shouldn't be this many mental errors. The offensive line is like an old house with faulty wiring: when you flip the switch, the light comes on most of the time, and good luck figuring out why it doesn't come on a few times. That said, GD had better be careful in how much he relies on only the core 5 offensive linemen to protect Colt. Five wide may be a nice change of pace, but an entire series of plays based on it, or using it on third and long, is going to get Colt injured or result in a turnover.
Greg Davis is a Genius
In an ode to GhostofBigRoy's call for series-based playcalling, I give you Texas' third drive against the Pokes at 14:25 of the second quarter. The previous (second) drive self-destructed from missed blocks by Greg Smith and Chris Hall and a failed run on first down, Colt throwing to a triple-covered Shipley for 3 yards when James Kirkendoll was 10 yards from anyone wide open 3 yards downfield on the opposite side of the play on second down, and a missed block by David Snow allowing Colt to get tripped up on a QB scramble.
With visions of Wyoming and Colorado dancing in the fans' heads, Texas started their third drive, after Hubert Anyiam's fumble, with three plays from 4 or 5 wide receiver sets. After overcoming a first down failure of the empty backfield and a sack of Colt, the Horns started first down on the OSU 38. The Horns, using their 11 personnel set with a running back and Greg Smith as the TE, ran the most beautiful series of running plays of the season.
1st down - Jet sweep to Marquise Goodwin (surprise, not DJ Monroe) for 7 yards.
2nd down - Spread counter to Cody Johnson up the middle for 7 yards. Charlie Tanner had awesome lead block.
1st down - Fake the jet sweep to the left and run Fozzy on a counter sweep to the right for 6 yards.
2nd down - Zone read, the DE crashes on Fozzy to seal the backcut, and Colt keeps for 6 yards.
1st down - Play action, fake the zone stretch left, Colt rolls out to the right and finds Marquise Goodwin in a seam vacated by Jordan Shipley's crossing route for 11 yards.
1st down - Jumbo package - Cody Johnson goes 2 yards and breaks the plane of the goal line - touchdown.
So the next time someone tells you that Texas has no running game, no misdirection, or no playaction passing, you can whip this out. The Horns have now used multiple plays to set up multiple other plays on the same drive, including in the running game. MORE OF THIS PLEASE!
Greg Davis goes from genius to imbecile on the same drive
It's the first drive of the second half. After the best playaction pass of the year for 44 yards to Malcolm Williams on a post pattern vacated, once again, by a Shipley crossing route underneath, Texas has the ball on the OSU 20. We're seconds away from 31-7 and good night ladies....
1st down - Cody Johnson on the zone stretch, cuts back inside and, with a good block from Buckner, gets 6 yards.
(Yeah, baby, pound it home!)
2nd down and 3 - Oops, OSU dances in front of Adam Ulatoski, threatening the blitz. Uli decides to tango. False start -5 yards.
2nd down and 8 - Davis can't get the play in in time AFTER A PENALTY &^&%&I. - 5 yards
2nd down and 13 - Let's call a play that hasn't worked all year against a defense that isn't blitzing. Shovel pass to Fozzy, who is clocked by an unblocked linebacker. - 4 yards
3rd down and 17 - Using 11 personnel (Okay, the Horns aren't running, it must be for max protect), Greg Smith runs out in the flat, Colt gets harassed and throws it to Smith for 5 yards.
4th down and 12 from the OSU 23 - Hunter Lawrence bails out the Horns with a 40-yard field goal.
What does it all mean?
Somehow, out of the flickering lights of GD's brain and the offensive line's attention span, Texas has a top offense that is going to look unstoppable on some series and infuriating on others. It is what it is, and I will officially stop complaining from now on and start appreciating it when the lights are fully on.
0 recs | 26 comments
i was wondering
where you were going with the “GD is a genius” thing.
So true about the polarity in my own GD feelings. He has up and down multiple times a game.
And yes, more of this please. Don’t be afraid to switch it up and use the talent behind that dusty old playbook.
Infield Elephant - November 4, 2009
Inside runs...
that’s 2.8 ypc. Even better!
DMH - November 4, 2009
Mack calls the play
If you watch the video after Ulatoski’s false start they cut to Mack and he pulls down his mic and tells GD over the headset “let’s pass.” Maybe GD had a run play in mind and had to take a few more seconds to pick a pass play after the head coach gives his orders. Either way Colt had plenty of time to get that next play off.
aaronlybrand - November 4, 2009 via mobile
Great Piece bny...
It’s either gold or pyrite on playcalling. I say throw the shuttle pass in the same can we put the Q package in and set to the curb.
Good note on the delay of game also aaronlybrand. Someone posted last week about what we all need to do when Mack pulls down the mic boom from on top of his head and covers his mouth during a drive….“grab our nuts”…..I laugh everytime I see him do that during a game now. I wish I could find the post to give credit where credit is certainly due.
orangetower - November 4, 2009
ah..the power of the search engine..
..search “grab nuts” and this popped up
Although I should’ve guessed.
vy til i die - November 4, 2009
L-O-L
run Bevo run - November 5, 2009
Friggnin' genius....
…. HornChamps nails it again. Thanks orangetower.
I can’t believe you fella’s haven’t picked up on it.
HornChamps - November 5, 2009
:)
It was you….Bravo….I went back and rec’d it…classic
orangetower - November 5, 2009
1st down play where Greg Smith "missed" block
It looks like Greg Smith initially may have helped the right OT get into his block (which was successful) and then went after the outside runside LB. It was absolutely impossible for Greg Smith to get into his block on the OLB (who is initially lined up way outside Greg) when Fozzy headed straight for the sideline. The only way Greg could have helped Fozzy on that play is if Fozzy cuts back. Fozzy did not cut back because the MLB was in the cutback lane.
Prior to the snap, the OLB was covering Ship. Once it was apparent that it was a run play (or maybe even sooner), the OLB stopped covering Ship and played the run. Ship made no attempt to block the OLB even though he had by far the best angle. If you are going to run outside, you need good blocks from the WRs on the run side.
From a blocking angle perspective, it would have made much more sense for Greg to block the MLB and for the WR to block the OLB. Unfortunately Ship probably can not actually block most LBs so there is a problem with the play design.
Sometimes OL gets blamed when the actual culprit is play design or a back not setting up a block or a WR not blocking or etc.
Kafka - November 4, 2009
I feel like
a lot of the confusion on offense this year is somewhat due to the lack of stable personnel. We spent the better part of the first half of the season rotating running backs (the glorious emergence of Newton seems so long ago), and GD not being able to decide whether to stick with the 4-5 wide, or to utilize EBS more. This has settled down more, and the fact that we finally got a solid starting 11 on offense is what I got the most enjoyment out of after the Missouri game (when GD eventually figured out that using a TE has benefits). So what should have been taking place during the first few weeks, figuring out how best to use the weapons we have, was delayed due to the fact that we spent so much time actually figuring out what weapons to use, which is never a bad problem, but can be frustrating when the pieces don’t fit right. I only see this offense getting better as Colt keeps practicing with this current group (Ship, Malc, Goodwin, Fozzy/CoJo, and EBS).
circa1015 - November 4, 2009
+1
Holy cow circa, we can agree on something!
The constant maneuvering had to be hard on Colt to get settled. I think the move of Shipley back to the slot gives Colt the security of something known and reliable. We can see this opening up other reads for him and especially giving him the confidence to go deep and take shots knowing he has the check down to Ship if need be. The RB settling and EBS are notables as well. I hope we stay with it and let these guys gel.
orangetower - November 4, 2009
I don't know...
On that 2nd half drive the game was already VERY well in hand, and we were in field goal range. Maybe GD wasn’t just being a tard — maybe he was wearing out the OSU defense, running the clock, and getting our running game some practice with plays that hadn’t worked before. And, maybe he didn’t want to give away any more of the playbook to future opponents.
In other words, the big picture looks okay to me on that drive, even though the play-by-play was “imbecilic”.
tblog123 - November 4, 2009
I cannot get onboard with this statement
This statement makes me want to kick puppies and feed kitties to sharks.
So instead, I’m going to use the term “крах”. It’s a Russian term for what happens in my brain when I see people use this.
There is nothing like going up to a guy robbing you and trying to thump him to death because you don’t want to show too much to the next guy that is going to try and rob you.
run Bevo run - November 5, 2009
я тоже rBr.
learned hand - November 5, 2009
1st down "miss" by Chris Hall
Mack/GD are asking Hall (the center who is making a shotgun snap) to then block a guy to his right outside when the run is to the right of both players. It is just not a realistic expectation for Hall to do that. It seems more reasonable to have a center help out initially on a double team and then go out and block an LB (for example).
Again, the problem is bad play design or blocking scheme.
Kafka - November 4, 2009
"Missed" block by Snow on 3rd down
The pocket was in good shape when Colt left after not finding a WR open. I don’t blame any OL guy on that play. Once the QB leaves the pocket, the blocking angles are completely changed so the OL is unlikely to block effectively after that.
Kafka - November 4, 2009
Baiting Zac Robinson
I totally agree with this. I thought the same thing when I watched the replay. My guess is Thomas was assigned to leave the slot receiver and jump the outside receiver. If so, it is a great design, because the QB is likely reading the flat defender (Thomas) on this play to decide where to go with the ball. When he sees Thomas on the slot receiver, his throw is to the outside man.
God I love Muschamp. He is two steps ahead of everyone else.
Reggieball - November 4, 2009
Small nitpick
Keeston Randall is a true soph. He never redshirted.
Great write up.
Horncasting - November 4, 2009
Terrific piece
Great analysis, excellent explanation with detail of what you’re conveying. Haven’t seen a replay yet, but feel like I just did.
Peter Bean - November 4, 2009
I totally agree....
….. with your assumption Will Muschamp set Zac Robinson up for E.Thomas’ INT. Simplistic tendencies are like raw meat to Muschamp. Great write up!
HornChamps - November 5, 2009
good write up-but the inside running game of OSU.....
Hornsup21 - November 5, 2009
power running team
“While the Houtson-Randall-Alexander trifecta may not be composed of the best individual defensive tackles in the Big 12, they are good enough to stop the best power running team on the schedule without altering the defensive formation or changing personnel.”
You think OSU’s o line is comparable to Alabama’s or Florida’s? …I don’t either.
I STILL see either of those teams ( if we make it)deciding to pound the middle as a big issue to be addressed.
Great write up.
Hornsup21 - November 5, 2009
Given the Skill players on both of those teams
I wouldn’t be adverse to moving a safety up (oh wait, Christian Scott is ineligible and regardless of Gideon’s improvements, I don’t want to think him tackling Ingram 1 on 1 in space) or playing more much more 4-3.
Also, I like our ends against Bama’s tackles so inside may be their best option by a mile. Narrow the options and I like Muschamp’s odds of finding a way.
learned hand - November 5, 2009
Defensive options...
When I said on the schedule, I meant regular season. Alabama or Florida aren’t yet on it, although they are the most likely.
Texas could easily take Alabama’s passing offense with their base 4-3. It’s possible that Alabama could overpower Randall and Houston, but Kindle or Robinson could realistically cover their tight ends, so Muschamp could bring in a fourth linebacker if needed, forcing Alabama to beat them through the air.
I see Florida’s or Alabama’s line as being only more than a little better than OSU’s. Okung is a first round draft choice and Andrew Lewis at center and Brady Bond might be drafted. The Florida line in particular hasn’t exactly chewed teams to pieces, and Tebow’s ypc was under 4 until last week.
burnt in ny - November 5, 2009
I’d actually feel pretty comfortable with the matchup in the running game between UT’s front seven (particularly the tackles and Muckelroy) vs. the interior ‘Bama line and Ingram. I think Muck would have a whole lot of hurtin’ for Ingram.
burntorangehorn - November 5, 2009
I would think we'd see a bit of Vaccaro in that mix as well
orangetower - November 5, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.