Flavor of the Week at running back: Tre' Newton. It's been quite a season for this feature -- numerous running backs stepping into and out of the starting role in the Texas offense, but never able to hang onto the job. In all, my biggest regret is not giving Jamison Berryhill the Flavor of the Week Award after his performance against UTEP -- I just couldn't do it because of his fumble. Just in the last month and a half, Fozzy Whittaker looked like he earned himself the job with a strong game against Oklahoma, then it looked like Whittaker and Johnson were a strong one-two punch before Johnson carried 19 times for only the second 100-yard rushing game of the season against Baylor. Then, Johnson had a mediocre eight carries for 15 yards against Kansas and perhaps the coaches felt like his coming into the game too strongly signalled a running play -- probably because it did. Combined with his lack of ability to split out in the passing game and Johnson fell by the wayside with Vondrell McGee and Whittaker, carrying the ball only once against A&M.
The star of that game at running back was Tre' Newton, who received his first extended action since the Texas Tech game against Baylor when he broke off a 45-yard touchdown run and then came back with 12 carries for 66 yards and three catches for 36 yards against Kansas. Fully recovered from his concussion, Newton showed the ability that had some calling him the perfect fit for the Texas scheme after his strong performances against Wyoming and Tech early in the season.
What is it about Newton that makes him so valuable to his team? Perhaps his most valuable skill is his ability to pick up the blitz. It's obvious at this point that Texas is a passing team first and foremost, sprinkling in just enough running to keep the defense honest at times. Newton has been as good picking up the blitz as he was advertised to be in the spring -- his work in that respect by have been the most underrated part of the Texas win on Thursday, as he did not appear to miss an assignment at all during the game. At a solid 6-0, 200 pounds, Newton has the build that Whittaker does not to pick up blitzing linebackers and stop them in their tracks.
Combined with his blitz pick up abilities, Newton can also catch the ball, as he showed against Kansas, but there is still room for growth in that area and it will probably have to happen with Garrett Gilbert because McCoy clearly does not have the same trust with Newton that he did with Chris Obgonnaya, hardly surprising since Newton has gotten little work with the first team, while McCoy worked with Ogbonnaya for three years.
Running the football, he's hardly spectacular, but he has an excellent sense of when to be patient and when to hit the hole hard, as evidenced by his 16 carries for 107 yards and touchdown, only the third 100-yard game by a Texas back this season. What sets him apart from Fozzy Whittaker is his vision -- where Whittaker tries to bounce everything outside, which probably cost him his job, Newton doesn't get caught stretching plays horizontally when he can get up the field. And while he isn't the fastest running back around, he hasn't been caught from behind and his size makes his speed somewhat deceptive, which is just about as effective for blowing up angles as is a pure, 4.4 burst. After the Baylor game, Mack Brown probably expressed it as well as anyone could -- he said that Newton simply plays fast in pads, he has football speed.

It also looks like Newton has a nice stiff arm, as well:
That stiff arm delivered to an Aggie defender segues into the next point -- since Newton doesn't necessarily have breakaway speed, he does have to break some tackles, which he accomplishes by running with good pad level and finishing by driving his legs. He's a tough guy to bring down, as several Aggies got taken for a ride late in the game (with an assist from EBS):
In other words, Newton is basically a bigger, faster, stronger version of Chris Ogbonnaya and that's an excellent sign for the future of the running back position.
Return of the zone read. While Colt McCoy picked up some serious yardage on scrambles and quarterback draws, his Heisman moment on Thursday night came on his 65-yard touchdown run on a zone read, that staple under Vince Young that McCoy struggled running early in his career because he wasn't making the proper reads and was rarely used this season as the coaches sought to protect their star quarterback. Well, it's back and in a big way.
At least for the Texas A&M game, that is. It's hard to say how effective it will remain for a major reason -- the Aggies didn't seem prepared for it. During the game, they eventually adjusted by having the read man get upfield and force the handoff, but Nebraska and Florida/Alabama if the Longhorns win on Saturday may use the now tried-and-true technique of forcing the quarterback to keep the ball by crashing the read man down the line of scrimmage, then scraping a linebacker to that side to cover the quarterback -- basically the way that teams stop the zone read these days.
Doing that, however, may take a scraping linebacker out of the play on the straight inside zone, which could open up holes for the running back and allow a lineman to even get to the third level of the defense. Basically, running the zone read should open up the running game for Texas because the defense has to decide where to commit resources -- to stopping the running back or stopping McCoy by scraping a linebacker and leaving the Longhorns with even better numbers on the inside zone.
Here's a perfect example from the A&M game -- obviously the Aggies were caught off guard with the zone read, most likely just thinking the Longhorns were running the inside zone, but adjusted at halftime by sending the read man upfield to force a handoff:
The read man on the play gets upfield, giving McCoy a give read. The Aggie player on the right end of the line of scrimmage runs himself out of the play for some reason, perhaps concerned with McCoy, while the offensive line does an excellent job of sustaining their blocks and getting to the second level to take out the linebackers. It's a perfect example of how the threat of McCoy running can open up the running game -- Newton picked up 20 yards on this play extremely easily.
if teams get lazy and forget about McCoy, the Texas quarterback will gash them for big plays with his feet. If teams focus too much on McCoy, it opens up the inside zone for Tre' Newton. In other words, using McCoy in the running game is the best way for Texas to run the ball consistently and with him becoming a threat in recent weeks, it puts a ton of pressure on the defense and elevates the Longhorn running game from inconsistent and sporadic to a serious threat.
Malcolm Williams continues his emergence. Rivals has a scouting report ($) up from an opposing Big 12 coach about the Longhorns, from the context probably an Oklahoma coach because he talks about being physical with Shipley and Texas not having another dangerous receiver. Clearly, that coach hasn't watched the Longhorns over the last several weeks as Malcolm Williams and James Kirkendoll have emerged as excellent no. 2 and no. 3 options for McCoy. Of course, the same coach also said that McCoy "doesn't look like a substantial guy," so he clearly doesn't really know what he's talking about. Have you seen his guns the last two years, dude? The guy is ripped and has been for some time.
The bigger point here is that Texas is at a much different point right now with their receiving corps than they were a month and a half ago after playing Oklahoma, a game in which every receiver other than Marquise Goodwin had a bad day and Goodwin even made a huge mistake late by going behind the defender on a slant. Since then, Williams has accounted for 27 of his 35 catches, 411 of his 494 yards and both of his touchdowns. In the last two games, Williams has caught 15 passes for 235 yards and a touchdown -- nearly half of his receiving yards on the entire season and the second and third games of his career with more than 100 yards receiving. So, for that coach who hasn't been paying attention -- check out what Malcolm Williams has been doing, because it's pretty impressive.
More than pure numbers, though, Williams has opened up the Texas offense by providing a threat down the field, as well as a physical presence in the short passing game who has the ability to break a tackle and pick up big yardage. On one play in the second quarter, the Aggies failed to put a safety over the top of Williams and tried to jam him with Justin McQueen. As soon as McCoy saw him walking up on Williams, he pointed and made eye contact with his big receiver, perhaps making a sight adjustment on the play. Williams did an excellent job using his hands to get the inside release and then ran by McQueen, catching the pass at the first-down marker and accelerating downfield.
The play would have gone for a 75-yard touchdown had McQueen not made a shoestring tackle on Williams to limit him to a 28-yard gain. A productive play, but one that ended up essentially costing the Longhorns points because they were not able to score on the drive -- had Williams recognized that McQueen was right behind him and done something that a lot of running backs do well in chopping his feet high and hard, he might have broken the tackle and scored on the play.
Even with that small complaint, the play illustrates just how close Williams is to breaking big plays consistently. In fact, had McCoy hit him on several targeted deep passes, the Garland product and former track star may have easily eclipsed 200 yards receiving on the day -- it's clear that he and McCoy aren't quite on the same page consistently on deep passes. Part of the problem is that Williams seems to get caught up in hand fighting with defensive backs instead of trusting his speed to get him downfield, something that has caused McCoy to overthrow him twice in the last two weeks on plays that could have gone for touchdowns. If the Longhorns can get past Nebraska this week, then McCoy and Williams will have a little more than a month to get ready for a national championship game and connecting on deep passes. With how far they have come in a month and a half, that extra time could lead to some big plays even against good defenses like Alabama and Florida.
One key for McCoy might be to not try to lead Williams so much, but rather to make sure that he has a chance to make a play on the ball, even if he has to slow down to do so. Slight underthrows also make it more likely that a defensive back will interfere with the play and though that isn't as big in college football as it is in the NFL, 15 yards is still much more helpful to a drive than an incomplete pass. A perfect example of his came on the first drive of the third quarter when the Longhorns tried a play-action pass off their jet tempo look -- McCoy had some pressure in his face and had to get rid of the ball a little early, but overthrew Williams to the inside instead of giving him a chance to make a play on the ball.
Tracking: special teams play. For the second straight week, covering kicks was an abject disaster. The first problem is that unless he has some wind behind him or is in the thin air of Wyoming, Justin Tucker can't seem to put the ball in the end zone, forcing the Texas coverage kickoff unit to cover every single kick. The reasons for the other problems -- failing to fill lanes, missing tackles, not getting off blocks -- are harder to explain, but they need to get fixed and soon.
Virtually everyone on both the kickoff coverage unit and the kickoff return unit are to blame for the poor performace against the Aggies. Outside of the touchdown return from Goodwin, the Longhorns averaged a paltry 15 yards per return on the first six Aggie kicks -- that's a terrible average that would rank dead last in the country over the course of a season.
Here's a look at each kickoff return:
It's hard to say that the return unit made up for the consistently poor blocking the rest of the game with one good effort, but considering how much that one play changed the game, it's probably not out of line to say that. However, it doesn't excuse the poor effort by some of the same players on the coverage unit, particularly Kenny Vaccaro. A special teams standout since the Oklahoma State game, Vaccaro had by far his worst game as a Longhorn, with only one good block that was close to being a hold on kickoff, while committing another holding penalty and a late-hit personal foul on the return after Goodwin's touchdown when he jumped way late into Ryan Swopes and the two Longhorns pushing him out of bounds.
Vaccaro clearly walks a fine line between playing with near-reckless abandon and playing out of control. Against the Aggies, he was clearly out of control and he needs to reign himself in if he wants to keep playing on special teams because both of those penalties were extremely harmful to the field position in the game -- after his personal foul, the Aggies started their drive at the Texas 36 yardline, an extremely short field. Add in the penalty on Jeremy Hills and the special teams accounted for three of the six Longhorn penalties on the evening.
In the punting game, Justin Tucker was adequate, averaging just over 43 yards on his two kicks and Colt McCoy continued his streak of killing the ball inside the 20 on his pooch punts, punting for 33 yards and pinning the Aggies inside their own 8 yardline. The Longhorns also ran a fake punt, hiking the ball to Antwan Cobb, who pitched it to Malcolm Williams, who ran the option with Justin Tucker. The Aggie forced the pitch and Tucker got within two yards of the marker, but Nolan Brewster missed his block and Keenan Robinson could get not outside fast enough to get his block. The timing and position on the field of the call were questionable, but the Longhorns would have made it if it had only been 4th and 4 instead of 4th and 6 or possibly if Brewster could have made his block.
The special teams has disturbingly trended downward throughout the latter part of the season, as the kickoff return game has stalled at times, Jordan Shipley has fumbled twice, Justin Tucker's punting has been inconsistent, and the kickoff coverage has cratered over the last two weeks, giving up around 25 yards per return, which would put them in the bottom seven in the country over the course of a whole season. As it is, ranking 63rd in the country, right behind North Texas and Ball State, is hardly something to brag about. The Longhorns have some serious work to do if they can escape the Big 12 championship game against Nebaska before they move on to a possible national championship game, as both Florida and Alabama both rank in the top 15 in kickoff returns and Alabama ranks sixth in punt returns.
Tracking: third-down conversions. The Longhorns rank second this year in converting third downs, picking up nearly 48% of their attempts. Against the Aggies, Texas was slightly below their season average in conversions at 42% or five of 12.
Here's a look at each third down:
Taking out the final play and putting the two fourth-down sneak attempts in, the Longhorns finished at 46% for the game, close to their season average. The major blemishes were the two three and outs in the third quarter, which had more to do with more plays on first and second down than poor playcalling or execution on third down. Those two drives illustrate just how important it is to pick up yardage on first and second down -- this is why Greg Davis doesn't mind callilng short passes -- two short passes to set up third and short end up being extremely effective. What stands out here is that McCoy targeted Williams on two consecutive third and long plays and Williams converted the first and nearly converted the second, as his size and strength makes him difficult to stop when the cornerback has to respect his ability to go deep.
0 recs | 24 comments
GoBR
You breaking down film for Mack? Helping with the grading?
Good stuff, anyway. Thanks for the (it had to be considerable) time.
edsp - December 1, 2009
Took me way longer than expected
I’ll probably go back and look at what happened on kickoff coverage and break that down later this week.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - December 1, 2009
FWIW on kickoff coverage
I think it’s a lot simpler than any of us are trying to make it. TV commentators and Mack (and, no doubt, his staff) raved about big hits by certain players. Two turnovers forced in the OU game by kick coverage personnel. Impact of those “boom” hits.
That was the blood in the water. After that, all the coverage people wanted to be THE guy. So, some running out lanes. Too much full-speed charging, to achieve max impact on the tackle — but with the loss of maneuverability. Too much aggression, too little strategy. Players not willing to absorb a double-team block so a teammate could be left free.
Maybe.
edsp - December 1, 2009
I'll buy what you're selling here.
ctex80 - December 1, 2009
I don't have a whole lot to add
Just wanted to say I really appreciate how much time and effort you, PB, and the whole crew put into solid analysis each and every week.
bbatsell - December 1, 2009
agreed
great work. you guys are the best of SBN
drbadass - December 1, 2009
Amen to that!
First class material here fella’s. The freeze-frame stuff is really great!
HornChamps - December 2, 2009
After sitting down
and writing a few fanposts, I know how long it must take you guys to put these things together. A lot of times I’ll read through all of this info and not post any comments, but I do really enjoy absorbing all of your insight. So even if it doesn’t seem like many people are reading and enjoying based on the comments, just know that we are reading and enjoying.
aaronlybrand - December 1, 2009 via mobile
Ditto
burntorangehorn - December 2, 2009
For sure
Caradoc - December 2, 2009
Kick Off Team
I think you’re right on GoBR with the kicker thing. Not only is the ball not getting into the endzone but it also does not get the height needed to allow our cover team to get to the ball carrier quick enough. Check the replays and see how many yards they get before a white jersey even get’s into the picture. It would seem better to do the high shorter kicks and have 4 guys to meet the return man at the 25 than to drive the ball low to the 4 or 5 yard line and allow the returner to set up blocks.
Thanks again for all you do.
orangetower - December 2, 2009
Vacarro
If you look close, you will see he did not hit the Aggie out of bounds.
Caradoc - December 2, 2009
got a screen shot or something? i watchd the play a couple times and every time it looks like he landed on the player out of bounds and rolled off.. any contact off the field of play is a big no no. remember colt mccoy and oklahoma last year?
Displaced Longhorn - December 2, 2009
He Brushed The Player - Penalty More for Stupidity than Hit
realmccoy - December 2, 2009
and it should have been, when he walked back to the Texas bench, Muschamp should have kicked him in the balls, hit him on the nose with a rolled up newspaper, and let out a resounding “NO!”. he looked like he was jumping in a dog pile out of bounds after the player, what an idiot. between the basketball court incident and this, vacarro looks to make pretty stupid decisions when his adrenaline is pumping.
Displaced Longhorn - December 2, 2009
Muschamp does not coach special teams
run Bevo run - December 2, 2009
Muschamp coaches everything.
pleaseplaykindle - December 2, 2009
I remember hearing Newton
talking about his pass protection last spring and he gave much credit to his high school system. Saying that if you’re a running back at Southlake you better be able to pick up the blitz., especially if the qb is the coaches son.
2Cor12:9 - December 2, 2009
His Dad Prolly Had Him Blocking as a Kid - Never figuring he would be a RB
realmccoy - December 2, 2009
Correct.
Also a shotgun-spread team, so he’s using to running in a similar scheme that I imagine used a lot of zone blocking, though I’m not positive on that one.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - December 2, 2009
Excellent analysis
Thanks for taking the effort GOBR
Crimson Fog - December 2, 2009
RB question
I don’t understand this point.
First, I would think blitz pickup would be the most important factor (other than production running the ball) and would keep a RB on the field in both running and passing plays. If RB is doing an adequate job of this (which is seems Johnson has been doing), I don’t understand why the vast majority of the plays where he is in the game are running plays.
Second, why would you ever want to split out a RB on a passing play, as opposed to putting in a true WR?
Horncasting - December 2, 2009
When the Longhorns go to their empty set
it’s almost always — at least 80% if not higher — with a running back split out. I can’t speak for Greg Davis, but I believe the thinking is that substituting a wide receiver into the game lets the defense go to a dime package, whereas keeping Newton or whoever else in the game doesn’t necessarily indicate pass, though Texas hasn’t run hardly at all with four wides since the Oklahoma game. Less than 10 times I would guess. Texas also usually runs clear-out routes in the empty set, where one or both of the outside receivers just run straight downfield to give room to the other receivers — in other words, there isn’t much route complexity expected from the running backs. Same thing with John Chiles in the same sets with the exception of running screens for him.
The problem with Johnson in the last few games is that the Longhorns have almost always run the ball when he’s in the game. Without going back through every play of those games, I would guess that the tendency is well over 80%. Baylor is obviously the exception, but I would guess the coaches don’t feel quite as comfortable with him picking up the blitz as they do with Newton and I seem to remember Johnson talking after that game about how hard he has been working on it, which indicates that he did struggle with it at times.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - December 2, 2009
Thanks for the response
I don’t have any kind of bias for one RB over the other, I just want the most production out of the offense.
Horncasting - December 2, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.