SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Burnt Orange Nation

Freshman Contributors: Garrett Gilbert

Setting the stage

In 2009, freshman quarterback Garrett Gilbert won't contribute in the same way that Barrett Matthews could contribute in helping the first-team offense win games -- for Gilbert, it's more about laying a foundation for taking over in 2010. Mack Brown has made it abundantly clear that he regrets not playing Colt McCoy as a true freshman, setting up the overly conservative game plan and loss at home to Ohio State in 2007. The propensity of Brown and company to retreat into "let's not lose the game mode" on offense was a constantly nagging factor leading to Brown's reputation for having an inability to win big games. The handling of Garrett Gilbert in the fall is a perfect opportunity to manifest those learnings though major philosophical adjustments.

Avoiding past mistakes

Long-winded ground setting aside, there's a difference between meaningful and meaningless snaps. Sorry, there's still some more ground setting: The "Lightning" package in 2007 lead by John Chiles and the second-team unit was conceived, but never made a priority until the Holiday Bowl rolled around. Abortive, just like the "Q" package the following season. That's 0-for-2 in attempting to develop John Chiles.

Star-divide

In two seasons at quarterback, those "Lightning" package plays were the only meaningful snaps Chiles received. Everything else was designed to run out the clock in terms of play-calling, with Chiles often pressing trying to make something happen in an effort to earn more playing time. How productive is it for the potential future starting quarterback and the head coach/offensive coordinator to have different goals late in blowouts?

If the Longhorns want to be competitive in 2010, like BCS bowl competitive, which should be the goal even in a re-loading season ("re-building" isn't in the vocabulary), Gilbert must receive the meaningful snaps in his first season that Chiles never received in his two years.

What are "meaningful snaps?" A meaningful snap is a snap with the intention of picking up maximum yardage, scoring more points. It's about "game" repetitions, not shepherding the clock and opposing coaches feelings to an end that keeps the opponent from feeling too bad about themselves.

The Plan

Gilbert needs work during games with the group of players he will be playing with throughout his career. Colt McCoy won't need a ton of repetitions to stay sharp in the fall, so designate a group of players with eligibility after 2009 to form a unit with whom Gilbert will get game reps. Players like Malcolm Williams, Brandon Collins, James Kirkendoll, DJ Grant, John Chiles, DeSean Hales -- rapport with the receiving corps is more important than other positions and takes longer to build.

Use Gilbert and his unit (the "G-Unit?") early in games during the non-conference season, even against Texas Tech. For Chiles and the "Lightning" package, it was roughly every third series. That works. Consider attempting to actually run the offense Gilbert will be in charge of in 2010 instead of killing the clock when sitting on a big lead. If the human pollsters proved one thing last season it was a fascination with major offensive output. What good did it do to score only 49 points against the Aggies when the Sooners were dropping 60+ on everyone and the pollsters were sprouting gigantic boners as a result?

Going undefeated and making it to Pasadena are the ultimate goals of the 2009 season and will probably necessarily go hand-in-hand, but the biggest tertiary goal of the season is helping Gilbert gain confidence and experience entering his sophomore season. If the Longhorns do run more high-tempo, no-huddle offense in 2009 and envision that as the future, Gilbert needs experience getting up to the line of scrimmage and getting plays off quickly.

Whither the Gilbert offense?

Any time the offense changes quarterbacks, it's look must change correspondingly, even if the change is more evolution than revolution. To that end, answering the following questions becomes a high priority: How much can Gilbert run the zone read? The offenses of Rich Rodriguez and Urban Meyer demonstrate that adding the option to the spread is one of the most effective ways of running the football without a fullback. If the zone-blocking scheme doesn't make progress in 2009, how will the Longhorns run the football if they stay in a predominantly 11-personnel shotgun spread? Can Gilbert run the zone read at all? Will the passing game continue to rely on short, high-percentage passes? What about the tempo?

Once again, the formula is simple -- get Gilbert meaningful snaps and the 2010 Longhorn offense should be able to hit the ground running before Big 12 play starts. It isn't necessarily about contributing in 2009, but putting Gilbert in the best position to succeed when he takes over for Colt McCoy. To answer the questions posed above, Gilbert should focus on specific areas of improvement:

  1. Throwing the deep ball - Gilbert significantly cut his interceptions from his junior year, 11 to 6. However, after watching Gilbert against Dripping Springs and Westlake, the decrease may somewhat be a result of better decision-making, but also a function of opposing defenders generally lacking ball skills. that was the case on several throws in the two games I was able to watch. Supporting that theory is the percentage of his interceptions that he threw in the playoffs -- 50%, in a fraction of the attempts. Even looking at his highlights, Gilbert would often heave great parabolas downfield off his back foot and let his receivers go make plays on the ball. High school throws to the max. Gilbert will have Malcolm Williams in the prime of his career -- as a junior and senior, so throwing the deep ball will have a bigger role in the offense than 2008, if Gilbert improves his footwork and flattens out his throws a bit to decrease hang time.
  2. Maximizing his speed and explosiveness - Colt McCoy is now faster and more explosive than he was when he arrived at Texas. Garrett Gilbert needs to be faster and more explosive in 2010 than he is right now. The positive is that everyone around Gilbert says that he's a hard worker. After picking up so many yards on the ground in the playoffs, I felt much more confident about his ability to run the football in college, but after watching a my man-crush JW Walsh, I've tempered by expectations. Granted, that may be a big of an overreaction, especially because Gilbert's athleticism will always be somewhat sneaky because of his size. He doesn't exactly cover ground like Vince Young, but he does cover a lot of ground with each stride because of his 6-4 (possibly closer to 6-5) height. A lot of the skill position guys work with speed trainers, which may be a good idea for Gilbert. The easiest piece of advice -- just do whatever Colt did.
  3. Making college-level throws - In high school, where the defensive backs are generally small and not that fast, it's easy for talented quarterbacks to get into bad habits throwing the ball into coverage and letting the receiver make a play on it. Gilbert is as guilty of this as any quarterback and needs the opportunity to adjust to the college-level speed of the game before 2010. Fortunately for the Longhorns, even if Gilbert never receives the prescribed work, he will be facing an excellent secondary in practice that will help him make the adjustment.

1 recs  |  53 comments

Comments

Gilbert

Great post Roy.

Gilbert is going to be a beast!

God College Football needs to come back, and fast. I’m having serious withdraws!

Clarification Question

Would the time alloted to the G Team be the G-Spot? Great post as usual.

Ha! Yeah, I think that works.

but i really like G-Unit :)

I was hoping for "The Grapes"
This is your opinion of sportsmanship?
It’s about “game” repetitions, not shepherding the clock and opposing coaches feelings to an end that keeps the opponent from feeling too bad about themselves.

Ignoring that there are many other reasons beyond the opponent’s feelings for not continuing to run a hurry up pass heavy offense when you are in a commanding lead, this is your opinion of sportsmanship?

Yes.

It’s one thing to leave the starters in until late in the fourth quarter like Bob Stoops likes to do and completely different to play every snap with the best interests of your future in mind. The point isn’t to run up the score, which pollsters actually seem to like and an argument could be made that not doing so against the Aggies last year hurt the Longhorns a little bit — rather, the point is to make sure that the future at quarterback is ready to play in 2010. How does it do Gilbert any good if the only experience he gets as a freshman is handing the ball off to Cody Johnson in the fourth quarter of blowouts? What happens in 2010 when we play OU and he just isn’t ready for the big-time like Colt McCoy wasn’t in 2006?

Colt beat OU in 2006

And putting the loss to tOSU squarely on Colts shoulders is an oversimplification at best.

This is the same discussion we had last year, the play for the future or the play for now.

And always, always always always do you play for now. If putting GG in increases our chances of losing any game by any amount he rides the pine until the game is in a situation to where he doesnt.

Taking a Senior Colt out every third series would be even more of a travesty than taking out a Junior Colt was this year to stagnate our offense with the Q. Screw that. The goal is to win the game, every game, every time. Colt should play until we are sure we can’t lose. Then put in GG.

If its at a point where that means he hands the ball off every first and second down, so be it. He has 3 more years to throw passes. Maybe the first series he comes in we keep in the rest of the first team offense, and he tries to score a TD, but don’t take Colt out unless the game is over.

The minute you play for the future, you lose sight of today. And in College football, you cant afford to do that, ever. As Herm would say, “You play to win the game.”

Adding to that

There is a very real chance that there will be a 3 man race for the heisman from game 1 through the end of the season. I think Mack will keep Colt in and let him “pad his stats” quite a bit longer and in more games than he might otherwise.

Mack Brown has made it abundantly clear that he regrets not playing Colt McCoy as a true freshman

We aren’t in 2006 anymore and I for one am extremely glad that Colt will be our starting QB this year. If he’d played some meaningless snaps in 2005 he’d be gone now.

Despite Colt being very green against tOSU and Texas losing that game (not entirely his fault), there is still a very good chance we play for the MNC in 2006 if Colt doesn’t get hurt against KSU.

Why not both

I agree with GhostofBigRoy that the back-up QB needs meaningful playing time, not just handing off the ball in the fourth quarter of a blow-out. I disagree that we can only either play for today or for the future. Texas is good enough to do both, especially given their cream-puff schedule this year. UT should be able to win games decisively and give the back-up QB meaningful snaps. Furthermore, the back-up needs experience not just for next year but for this year should, heaven forbid, Colt get injured. And speaking of injuries, I think that is one reason Brown will not keep Colt in just to pad his stats for the Heisman. It would be hard to justify if Colt were injured while running up his individual stats once the game was decided.

+1

I don’t imagine Mack putting in GG until we have built up a decent cushion (say 14-21 points). We should be able to do this against a lot of our schedule and then we can let GG run the full offense for a series here and there. YOU DO NOT build experience by just handing off the ball. You don’t get a chance to read the defense etc. GG will get a simplified offense as compared to Colt but that’s a given.

But GG must get in these games and run the normal offense. Not when we’re in a dogfight but when we’re comfortable.

Playing GG in 2009

GoBR – I’m with you on most of the post with some reservations.

First, I’d have to argue that the inability to develop Chiles as a QB was not due to the coach’s use of the “lightling” or “Q” package. Chiles didn’t develop as a QB any futher because he had already plateaued in that position.

Second, I’d argue that the use of these packages was probably more detrimental to the rythym of the Texas offense (or lack thereof in 2007) than it was beneficial to the development of the players in those groups. Case in point: In 2007, the offense lacked consistency and McCoy and the running game floundered at times. And to what benefit? Chiles? now at WR. Montre Webber? Transferred. For every drive that the coaches used these packages in the game, how much time was wasted in practice? There is a trade-off, and to your credit you do note that GG’s development should not come at the detriment of 2009 MNC aspirations.

The flirtation with the Q package just makes me even more skeptical that the coaches should use such an approach with GG because any time Chiles, Hales, and the rest of the offense spends away from McCoy has the potential of disrupting our flow. Let’s not forget that the 2008 offense did not always perform like the well-oiled machine on display versus Missouri, Kansas or in the 2nd half versus OU. Until the coaches feel confident that the offense is completely in tune (and that spending less time with Colt at the helm in practice), GG should not be running with any member of the 1st team in practice or otherwise beside the typical amount of time that the 2nd stringer gets.

The way to reconcile all of this is for Mack to simply understand that just because the game is out of hand he doesn’t have to run the ball every snap. Its not running up the score if the 2nd team is out there moving the ball down the field. GG ought to come in and play most or all of the entire 4th quarter of blow outs, and the coaches ought to have the majority of the offensive playbook available to them. Give GG the chance to see the field with the 2nd unit to gain game experience, and then give him the offseason to build a rapport with the other first teamers once we have the MNC trophy on the in the trophy case.

I agree about not disrupting the flow of the offense,

but I think the hope is that at least in the passing game, that McCoy and company come out sharp from the very first snap. Developing and finding a consistency with the running game is another matter.

If one thing is sacrificed in the plan I laid out, I think it should be the every third series or so part, for the reasons you mentioned. However, those would be the most valuable snaps to Gilbert facing an opponent’s first-team defense, so I think that should be weighed as well.

What about Sherrod Harris?

Considering Mack’s character and his recruiting style, it seems unlikely that he will put true freshmen in front of a guy who have been waiting patiently for a number of years, despite the fact that he could have easily transferred. Unless GG is significantly a better backup and is more comfortable with our system than Sherrod, I really don’t see him getting more PT.

The idea of playing Gilbert late in the blowout games seem to make sense, but I am not sure how much that will benefit him. It is unlikely that the coaches will call the similar plays Colt would run with the first team offense. I imagine they would keep it very simple for Gilbert despite his so called high football IQ and knowledge of the game, because they do not want to risk injury of Gilbert who is going to be the future of our team. In other words, would you trust 2nd/3rd team OL and WRs to execute as well as other teams defense who still might have their 1st teamers??
Sure getting the “feel” of the game would benefit him tremendously…but is it really worth risking injury?

I'm operating under the premise

that Gilbert beats Harris out in the fall with both given an equal chance.

I responded the same upstream as hookemkp.

For the record, I sincerely doubt GG will be out Sherrod before the season starts. I think Gilbert would be extremely lucky to do so even by mid-season; there’s just too much ground to cover.

if Gilbert doesn't redshirt...

He has to be pencilled in as the #2 QB on day 1. Otherwise, why not use a redshirt? As the 3rd stringer, he will never make it into a game.

Unfortunately Sherrod’s time has come and gone. I admire his perseverance but starting at a D-1 program is not in everyone’s cards, even if you happen to be a 3 or 4 star recruit. Unless (god forbid) Colt goes down with an injury very early in the season, Gilbert ought to be the only other QB that sees significant time on the field. From the moment he sets foot on campus he’ll have better QB skills than anyone on the roster not named Colt, and he also happens to have played in a system not terribly unlike the one the ’Horns currently employ.

There is no sense is doing things half-assed here. If you intend to use one year of Gilbert’s eligibility he needs to see the field in 2009, and his PT better be somewhat meaningful. Burying him behind Sherrod is counterproductive.

You point to a decision in the future (if not now):

Do you go with someone who has several years experience in the system, both the offense and recognizing college defenses, blitzes and formations, or do you go with someone who has virtually no experience at college level speed?

Logically, most any freshman QB is going to have a learning curve – even VY had a steep learning curve – so I just don’t give much credence to a rookie coming in and being ready to go in no time flat. I don’t think that is realistic. If Sherrod is on the team, his time has not “come and gone.”

The smart move is to have Sherrod as the second string and, if GG has the overall skills to beat him out, so be it.

The last point involves team credibility: if you give the position to GG by fiat, by decree, the team will see through that…they know who should be getting playing time and who shouldn’t. GG has to earn it; there is no other way to get team respect.
 

You go with

The man that can consistently move the ball and keep possession of it. Regardless of all other considerations, it’s results that matter.

Agreed. That's generally goes hand-in-hand

 with the player who makes the fewest mistakes, which is who the coaches generally favor unless there is a particular dynamic in a single player (runner vs. passer for example, which is situational).

Better potential? Yes. Better skills? Absolutely not. Harris ran the scout team for a year, and he has been on the roster and running the system for two years since. I’d say Gilbert has a whole lot of ground to cover before he sniffs that level of experience, and the skills that have come with it. He’ll get there soon enough, but in his first semester on campus? Doubt it.

S. Harris

If Mack does this, then he will fall back to his old ways. Mack should play the best player and that is GG.

How do you know this?

I'm mixed on my feelings about what to do with him

On the one hand, you could argue that the ideal scenario is that Harris proves to be a capable backup and GG redshirts. This not only allows Gilbert to sit, watch, learn, and develop, it allows us to keep him another season, assuming he doesn’t leap early to the NFL. In the sense, it’s better for our future.

However, this team is relatively young and you can argue we have some pieces to make another serious run at a conference title after Colt leaves. In that case, having Gilbert be our backup this year will arguably make him more prepared for the following season. Also good for our future.

Personally, I’d like to redshirt him. But if he beats out Harris, then that’s fine. I don’t think he should play unless we have a sizeable lead though; while it’s not the greatest of experience to play in mop-up duty, it’s still a taste of Saturday football.

The only failure in developing John Chiles was in John Chiles’s failure to develop. I have some confidence in Harris. However, he is a year behind due to injury and the ensuing lack of playing time after falling behind Chiles.

I see Gilbert as the number two QB by mid-season.

Too funny
What good did it do to score only 49 points against the Aggies when the Sooners were dropping 60+ on everyone and the pollsters were sprouting gigantic boners as a result?
the sooners gave up waaay more than 9 points against the aggies!
Great stuff!

I completely agree, Big Roy. Play Gilbert as much as you can Gilbert needs the experience and it reduces the risk of injury to Colt. The trick is how to know when you are far enough ahead that it is relatively safe to bring in Gilbert. I’m thinking 3 TDs sounds about right.

GG

Mack also has to worry about players leaving early to the NFL. GG won’t redshirt because of this issue. I think GG will earn the #2 spot before the season start and at the latest by time Big 12 play starts.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.