Wyoming defensive strategy helps slow Longhorns. Last week, Mack Brown talked in a press conference about how surprised the coaching staff was last season when teams kept on blitzing Colt McCoy and blitzing McCoy some more. Brown said that teams revealed concern over allowing McCoy to stand in the pocket and pick apart a zone defense. Wyoming might have seen that comment and decided to try a different game plan at times, rushing only three and dropping eight into coverage. Early in the game, McCoy and the Texas offense looked confused by the look as the Heisman contender often locked in on Jordan Shipley and couldn't find his roommate and long-time friend. Then, at other times, Wyoming did blitz McCoy and often left the Texas offensive line confused and struggling with their pass protection, leading to many occasions in the first half where McCoy had to scramble to try to make a play.

Greg Davis responded in the first half by putting in Greg Smith and going max protection at times. Wyoming responded by dropping eight into coverage once again and leaving McCoy with few options in the passing game. Part of that falls on Davis for becoming conservative when he needs to keep Dan Buckner on the field. At the same time, does Colt McCoy miss Brandon Collins a little bit as his hot receiver? It's certainly possible, especially considering how well Collins played late in the season.
In the second half, the Longhorns took advantage of a tired Cowboy defense that just didn't have the depth to play with Texas for more than 25-30 minutes. The concern moving forward is with the offensive line in pass protection, especially against blitzes. Opponents now have some footage of how to get to McCoy, just like BYU exposed weaknesses in Oklahoma's pass protection with delayed blitzes. Texas struggled against delayed blitzes last season as well and Davis and the offensive staff need to spend a lot of time this week working on correcting the problems or McCoy is going to take some big hits this season. Expect more teams to drop eight into coverage early in the game to try to keep McCoy from getting into a rhythm.
Running back flavor of the week: Tre' Newton. Before the start of the season, it was Vondrell McGee, supposedly more comfortable with the scheme. Last week, it was DJ Monroe after his strong performance running the football against the WarHawks. This week, it's Tre' Newton, the improbably small son of the former Cowboy offensive lineman.
Perhaps more so than DJ Monroe, who will remain a spot player for the conceivable future, Newton has a chance to not only earn the role as third-down back extraordinaire, but also earn 10 or more carries a game as the feature back. The reason is his versatility, which isn't exactly news, but hadn't truly been demonstrated on the field until Saturday. Even though Newton dropped one pass, he caught another that nearly converted a third-and-long situation and carried eight times for 62 yards and his first touchdown at Texas. Most impressively, he displayed excellent vision in hitting his creases quickly and at speed -- he looked supremely comfortable in the scheme. Furthermore, he blocked well, opening up a hole for Colt McCoy on a quarterback draw and throwing block downfield on Dan Buckner's third-down touchdown catch and run, while holding up well in pass protection.
Is he the answer to all of the problems in the running game? No, but he is a faster, seemingly more talented version of Chris Ogbonnaya and if he can continue to do the same things that OG did last year, hitting the hole hard, catching the ball out of the backfield, and blocking well, both in pass protection and on any draws Texas wants to run with McCoy, then it should be enough for the Longhorns to get to Pasadena and have an opportunity to win a national championship.
Bipolar special teams. After a blocked punt, another nearly blocked punt, a failed fake field goal, and a failed fake punt, it would be easy to conclude that the special teams were terrible against Wyoming. While there were undoubtedly bad, bad, bad moments, the special teams play ended up simply being bipolar.
Justin Tucker, when he wasn't making the unilateral decision to try to pick up a first down deep in Texas territory, was kicking balls out of the end zone in the thin air of Laramie, with only one returnable kick the whole game. He also debuted his left-footed rugby punt and delivered a 34-yarder inside the Wyoming ten yardline. DJ Monroe helped consolidate momentum at the start of the second half with a 41-yard return into Wyoming territory to give the offense a short field. Malcolm Williams had a 25-yard return and a 35-yard return, providing a nice element of physicality to the return game, as well as providing his steady, but underrated, work blocking on special teams and as a gunner on the punt team. Returning punts, Jordan Shipley averaged 10 yards a return, with another nice return called back because of penalty.
Of course, it will be the bad plays that draw the majority of attention, and they were certainly bad. Brown apparently told Tucker last season that he could go for the first down if he sees an opening in the defense and can make it without being touched. After being chewed out during hafltime, he probably won't be doing that again. Dave Christensen commented after the game that his coaching staff had seen something on film that they could exploit to get pressure on John Gold and almost blocked two punts as a result. Antwan Cobb has to do a better job as the personal protector -- replacing Rashad Bobino -- not commiting to a double team before he knows if there is someone else comingup the middle. The coaches should be able to get that fixed this week -- it's not too complicated. As for the fake field goal, several things stand out. One, the Longhorns should be able to pick up one yard in the jumbo package if they really want it. Secondly, the situation seemed ripe for a fake and it seemed even more likely when the long snapper walked back to Shipley before the play to ask him something or make a clarification -- even more indication. Mack Brown also said on Monday that the call got messed up and the play wasn't executed properly. It certainly looked like it.
The good news is that Texas is no longer as leaky as a sieve on kickoffs and Duane Akina is back coaching the special teams. The mistakes should be fixed this week and the special teams should go right back to providing the Longhorns with an advantage for the rest of the season with the embarassment of riches that Texas possesses in terms of options in the return games, a fantastic gunner in Macolm Williams, two accurate place kickers, and options in the punting game, including a kicker with the ability to rugby punt with either foot. Despite the problems in Laramie, you can bet that Frank Beamer gets jealous watching Texas on special teams.
Tracking: defensive tackles. Remember when the defensive tackle position was such a cause for concern, way back before the season started? After two games, those concerns are now squarely in the background as the play of the offensive line, the lack of gaudy stats by Sergio Kindle, and the three currently ineligible players draw the majority of the attention. And there's a reason for that -- the Longhorns have been excellent in the middle of the field, albeit against two teams that aren't exactly world-beaters.
Lamarr Houston has led the way, particularly against Wyoming, undoubtedly his best performance at defensive tackle. On one play, he sliced through a gap on the hip of Ben Alexander and brought down the quarterback in the backfield, looking positively Roy Miller-esque. Is he as good as Roy Miller? Probably not, but that's not exactly a criticism of Houston's play. Against Wyoming, he finished with four tackles, including two behind the line of scrimmage, one sack, and two quarterback hurries. The only blemish? Two false starts.
Next to Houston in the middle, Kheeston Randle probably had his best game as a Longhorn and looks like he will be a reliable contributor this season who can make some plays. Early in the game, he fought off a block nicely to stop a running play, then almost managed to push the guard blocking him back into the quarterback on another play, forcing a poor throw. There will be some inconsistent moments and he needs to work on using his hands better when being cut block, but there is an immense amount of potential just waiting to be tapped. He's going to be a good one and it's going to happen sooner rather than later.
Ben Alexander also had maybe his best day in a Texas uniform, making five tackles, including one for a loss. As mentioned last week, he's not going to be the best pass rusher from the position, but he's not going to be moved much on running plays and he looks as quick as he ever has in his four years. Interestingly, Calvin Howell played some at defensive end in the 3-4, most likely to allow him to use his quickness on the edge, which he did on one play that he just ended up over pursuing, and to keep him out of the middle where things happen so quickly. Besides registering his first career sack, Howell also made two tackles, one for a loss. Derek Johnson and Tevin Mims both saw their first aciton at Texas, with Mims recording two tackles.
Tracking: third down. After another excellent performance on third down last week against Louisiana-Monroe, the Longhorns struggled to convert against Wyoming, finishing 5 of 17 (29%), numbers hurt significantly by two first downs called back because of holding. Was the performance an anomaly, or does it portend a return to Earth by the Texas offense after otherwordly results last season on third down? Hard to say after one game, but it is something worth monitoring moveing forward.
The problem early on was mostly that Colt McCoy was out of rhythm and having his passes float on him in the altitude and, as mentioned above, the Wyoming defense deserves a lot of credit for playing extremely tough early in the game and coming in with a solid game plan to stop the Texas offense. In particularly the Cowboys did a good job of defending the drag route across the field that Texas likes to use for Jordan Shipley and James Kirkendoll, a play that Quan Cobsy and Brandon Collins converted in key situations last season.
Several other problems stand out. In the second quarter, the Longhorns went three-and-out after Vondrell McGee only picked up one yard on 3rd and 2. The play directly preceeding the unsuccessful fake field goal as a 15-yard gain by Tre' Newton on 3rd and 16. A false start by Chris Hall in the fourth quarter turned a 3rd and 6 into 3rd and 11 and an incomplete pass from McCoy. On the last possession of the game by the Longhorns, Garrett Gilbert didn't get the play off quickly enough and turned a 3rd and 6 into 3rd and 11.
Overall, the slow start by McCoy was a big part of the problem, but penalties on third down are perhaps the major culprit. Two first downs were called back and two more third downs were made longer by penalties. If the Longhorns can avoid major penalties on third dow and do a better job of protecting McCoy, the numbers should increase again next week, but if the Longhorns struggle as much against Tech as they did against, then it might be cause for some concern. Remember also that the Longhorns struggled on third down against UTEP last year in a similar type of atmosphere and only converted 1 of 6 third downs.
0 recs | 54 comments
Not worried about OL
as they are still finding their sea legs. I look for a redemptive effort come Saturday night.
Also, I just cannot get enough of the John Chiles bubble screen that went for a TD. That was some kind of explosive speed on display. I hope we get more of that!
TXStampede - September 15, 2009
I pretty sure GD does not need encourement to call the bubble screen. nt
billb - September 15, 2009
This is a first
That has to be the first time those words, in connection with each other, were typed on this blog. Maybe any blog.
GoHorns - September 15, 2009
To his credit
This is maybe the first time we’ve had the atheletes at reciever who were good enough blockers to make this work.
Something about this receiving corps has made them really gung ho about throwing blocks for their buddies, and it makes those bubble screens finally have a shot at being productive
notsofst - September 15, 2009
No doubt
It’s just something I would have never expected to see on this site.
I have to say, I actually don’t mind the bubble screen with this corps of receivers. For the reasons you pointed out. Chiles and M. Williams are very solid blockers. I’d love to see the bubble with DJ Monroe and Chiles and Williams blocking for him.
GoHorns - September 15, 2009
?
I seem to recall a situation of 3rd and 1 and we didn’t put Cody Johnson in… Anyone know why? He is the best short yardarge battering ram we have… yet it seems like McGee stayed in and we didnt get it…
LadyLonghorninOK - September 15, 2009
Was it during the hurry-up offense?
Could’ve been that they didn’t want to swap out personnel.
TXinDC - September 15, 2009
3rd and 2 perhaps?
As I went through the 3rd down plays I don’t recall a 3rd and 1, but there was the 3rd and 2 that McGee didn’t convert, not sure why Johnson wasn’t in on that one.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
I couldnt beleive we didnt use the Jumbo more
That third and 2 was the perfect time. Forget the hurry up, Cody is good for 2, and if not, he’ll get you 1.5 and another 1.5 on 4th.
I dont get the fake FG at all when we have as good of a jumbo package as we do.
BoddickerIsClutch - September 15, 2009
if teams never play their tendencies against us
then why don’t we plan for that?
abcdmetrius - September 15, 2009
The psycho-doc is in
If teams never play their tendencies against us, who says they have tendencies?
Three double tequilas will certainly solve this problem, on field or off.
whills - September 15, 2009
Running?
The horns are primarily a passing team but if the opposition defense sells out in terms of personnel and strategy to stop the pass then you need to be able to run the ball. Wyoming’s defensive strategy (sell out to stop the pass, disrespect the UT running game) has seemed like the obvious way to defend UT for quite a while.
GD optimizes everything for the pass:
Maybe the horns were simply keeping their best stuff under wraps until the Tech game.
If GD is going to completely blow off power running, what is the need for slow 300 pound guys on the OL? Why not put DE and DT types who can really run? They would be much better adapted for the UT OL environment where pass blocking is the key skill and power run blocking is not that important. These fast OL would also be much better on screen plays and zone blocking. You need to be huge if you are going to blast holes but if all you ever do is maintain contact with the defender (but not actually move him) then speed is more important than strength and size.
The 2009 UT OL was never going to be able to protect the QB that well against the very best defenses (eg: USC, Florida, OU, tOSU). The QB has to get rid of the ball quickly in these big games. It will be disastrous if Colt hangs onto the ball a long time (as he tends to do) against these teams.
It would also help the run game and screen game if the WRs are big, physical guys like Malcolm who can really block. Screens become hugely important if the run game withers.
Is Newton more talented than Ogbonnaya? We’ll see but I doubt it.
Mack’s strategy for dealing with the altitude in Wyoming was stupid. Before the game he blew it off as no big deal. After the game he admitted that he screwed up and then said he should have talked to the team about it. I don’t think talking would have done much good but helping the guys get acclimated before the game would helped. One approach would have been to work out with masks that reduce the air flow a bit.
Kafka - September 15, 2009
Great points
This topic could be its own thread. It is really helpful to have an analysis that takes the whole offensive scheme into account than just parts of it. I would love to see it fleshed out more and discussed.
Orangetower87 - September 15, 2009
Mack used the same approach the pros do for Denver.
The pros discovered it takes over 72 hours to acclimate to the altitude. If you fly in the day before the game, you’ll have a minimum problems within the first 36 hours. The real adjustment problems occur in the 36-72 hour window; that’s when the altitude can have the greatest impact. There was a period when this was a big deal with the pros before the current standard was developed.
Psychologically, the more you make it a big deal, the more the impact can be used as an excuse. Low humidity and dehydration are probably more serious problems than oxygen deprivation in the short term. And you can have bottled oxygen for those who do have serious breathing problems (ashma, etc.).
Of course, you could claim John Gold was suffering from hypoxia and get a few takers.
whills - September 15, 2009
It didn't work
According to Mack, the players all told Mack that the altitude posed problems. The game was played at 2000 feet higher than Denver (i.e. what works in Denver is not necessarily going to work at WU).
This idea that you get a free pass in your first 36 hours at altitude is dubious. I vacation in the mountains quite a bit and I certainly haven’t noticed that hiking is easier on the first day than the second. The locals and what I have read on the web recommend specifically to avoid heavy exercise the first day or two. The safest and smartest approach would have been to take the 3 days to get acclimated before you play the game. Maybe it would even be smarter not to play at the highest football field in America.
Common sense is that if you are going to exercise strenuously at very high altitude you should get acclimated first.
BTW, wasn’t it particularly stupid to play a day game given that hydration is such a big concern?
Kafka - September 16, 2009
You're right that an extra 2000 feet might make a difference.
HIking at 5-6,000 never seemed much different to me. But from 7,000 on up you can feel it more quickly. I’ve had trouble sleeping at 8800 feet – not altitude sickness but close.
The question about the three days is probably more about disrupting the coaches practice structure and team’s class attendance than serious health problems. You pose a real alternative, though.
Don’t know if they’ll go back but they might. Hydration can be solved if it pinpointed as a problem. Personally, I found it a more difficult adjustment going to live in Midland/Odessa for a few months than going up into the mountains.
whills - September 16, 2009
Criticism of Mack's methods....
…..is not accepted here. Be careful. Flying stones surround you.
HornChamps - September 16, 2009
when that's ALL (ok..95%) you do, it's gets old..nt
vy til i die - September 16, 2009
I have to admit that I’m not particularly worried about the slow start by the offense. It happens from time to time, especially early in the season, and it could be attributed to anything from not wanting to tip the hand to upcoming opponents to just plain shaking off the rust.
Welp, it looks like the coaches are going all-in on this season, and hoping to not experience much of a dropoff in 2010 either. It’s always tough to not hope for some redshirts with some guys, especially guys like Mims and Johnson, who could reportedly use some honing before being turned loose. But getting these guys playing time in real games will obviously pay off more for 2010 and 2011, even if it means losing a season of more significant contribution toward 2013. By that point, maybe DL depth will be less of a concern anyway.
burntorangehorn - September 15, 2009
Defensive tackles
I think part of the thought is probably to get some separation from the three 2010 guys as well. The Longhorns lose two guys in the rotation this year and pick up three, so the position should be plenty deep next year and I think Taylor Bible can definitely come in and play right away, with Dorsey a strong possibility as well.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
Weird science
Do balls really float in thin atmosphere? Isn’t that more about gravity?
Caradoc - September 15, 2009
Less oxygen / other elements in the air = less drag = ball gets thrown farther - it COULD explain Colt's early overthrows
TXinDC - September 15, 2009
They don't actually float...
That is just an expression, but the thinner air provides less air resistance which is what slows the ball down after it leaves the QB’s hand. The ball will travel further with less force. So if Colt throws with the force his arm is used to for a particular distance the ball will go farther… this is probably why several of his first half passes went high, or were under thrown if he was trying to over compensate.
Of course he could have just thrown a bad pass but we here at BON don’t believe that is a possibility as the earth’s atmosphere is a much more likely culprit than Colt.
BSnyder - September 15, 2009
Not convinced
Is the air density so great that it makes a significant difference in the flight of the ball? I’ve seen McCoy throw well in the rain and I would imagine that has a lot more impact. Let’s get the Sports Science guys on this.
Caradoc - September 16, 2009
The other element on high throws is the crown of the field.
A field with a high crown will cause QBs unfamiliar with the field to throw consistently higher on any out or sideline routes until they adjust. (Didn’t see the game, thus didn’t notice the field.) I’ve seen this happen many times. Experienced QBs often work on this immediately just to get their touch down. Of course, the wind is the other factor.
WRT throwing the ball, the home runs fly out of the stadium in Denver. So, you could say there the advantage is to the batter and not the pitcher. The pitcher may actually be able to throw a little harder, but that would also make the ball drive farther when hit well. They can’t win for losing in that situation.
whills - September 16, 2009
I have played tennis in high altitude and there is definitely an adjustment period. The ball goes much farther and faster compared to hitting it in central texas.
Not sure if a football is affected by the same amount, but most of Colt’s bad passes were overthrown and few were underthrown.
JohnsonUT - September 15, 2009
Just look at the kick offs.
Against ULM, quite a few of our kicks were returnable. I think only 1 or 2 made it deep into the end zone. By the way, wtf happened to this guy kicking 75% out of the end zone?!
Now look at the wyoming game. I think all but one of the kicks made it to the back of the end zone.
Remember, this place is 2000 feet even above CU’s stadium.
UT_BKC - September 15, 2009
Believe
McCoy said the ball felt “harder”, or perhaps it was dryer (low humidity) and that affected his control.
edsp - September 15, 2009
Gred Davis...and the road games...
Example(s)
1.Oklahoma, 2008
2. Texas Tech, 2008
3. Texas A&M, 2005
What do all these games have in common? Oh believe me there are many more examples, but the one thing all of these games have in common is Greg Davis’ fear of losing a game on the road. In all of these games we came out flat in the first half, but turned it on in the second half. Including this past week in Wyoming, GD plays not to lose on the road until he has no choice. Against Oklahoma last year we’re down 14-3 early, and if not for Shipley’s return, we may have been too out of it to come back. GD needs to realize we have more talent than a lot of our teams on the schedule and we need to be putting our foot on the gas against some teams because frankly they’re not going to be able to keep up, especially the way our D is motivated this year. Just an observation from this past week. Hook ’Em Horns and OU Sucks!
HornsAPlenty - September 15, 2009
We've always been a 4 quarter team
I’m not sure how the gameplan changes over the 4 quarters, but Texas has always had great second halves.
I’ve always attributed it to conditioning, but if you look at OU last year they were all about the first two quarters. If any D stopped them in quarters 1 and 2, they didn’t have any gas for 3 and 4.
While if you look at Texas, we had many more games contested ( and won ) in the third / fourth quarter. Look at our comebacks vs OSU over the years, or even our wins over OU. Our guys hang in there for 4, maybe it’s because we start slower?
notsofst - September 15, 2009
Texas has tremendous depth at most positions, and it appears the conditioning program is pretty good. Those are the two biggest factors in late-in-the-game dominance.
burntorangehorn - September 15, 2009
Greg Davis is also shaving points in the first half....
KevinJ - September 15, 2009
I don’t think it is that simple. You have to test the waters. Granted, we should have just been able to out size and speed Wyoming in the first half and at least put up 20+ points. But against beter teams (like the 3 games you listed), you can’t just start off with the same 5 plays that ‘work’ all the time. First, you will become very predictable. Second, you have to play the ‘chess’ game to see what your opponent is doing, where they are weak, and also give them some looks that make them thing twice.
I think that’s what everyone who is calling for someone to replace McGee is missing (even thoguh he got 5.5 ypc!!). If you put Monroe/Newton/whoever in for those first ‘test’ series in the first half, they will A) be playing against a fresher D and B) run more of the trial plays that won’t get called again because we see they won’t work.
UT_BKC - September 15, 2009
The thing about the RB debate
I see where all of the skepticism is coming from regarding the latest flavor of the week at RB. I agree to some extent, but where I think the difference lies this time is that we aren’t just talking about rushing production with Newton, we are talking about rushing production, blocking, receiving, knowing when to help when the QB is in trouble, plus he seems to actually fit the running scheme.
The debates between McGee and Johnson last year focused solely on recent production and which one was doing better in spite of the scheme not fitting them.
We’ll never know how well Newton may have done in the first half against Wyoming. At this point he is a fairly unknown commodity for this team. McGee is in his 4th year in the program and has had plenty of opportunities to excel and it has never happened. Time to try something new.
Horncasting - September 15, 2009
Mims
Did he play as a DT or “Strong” DE?
Horncasting - September 15, 2009
DE
It’s hard to tell on every play, but the ones I can see in the fourth quarter (don’t have a super high-quality recording) looks like he plays defensive end, both in the 3-4 and 4-3. I imagine in an obvious passing situation he might move inside and I think that’s where he’s more likely to get playing time in meaningful minutes, though I think he’s still a long way away from that.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
Is anyone else a disappointed we haven’t seen any pistol? I was really hoping that was something we were working on to use 5-10 plays a game that would help our run game a little bit.
UT_BKC - September 15, 2009
Pistol
A possible reason it is not being used is the lack of practice time to effectively install such a formation. I could be wrong, but I think Chris (smartfootball.com) wrote in the Eyes of Texas that part of Greg Davis’ philosophy is to perfect the core plays the offensive already uses, instead of wasting the minimal practice time on plays/formations that may only be used 2-3 times a game.
Hookem4life84 - September 15, 2009
Yeah, I’d like the pistol to be used a little more than 2-3 times though. I think we could probably throw just as effectively out of it, but probably get a bit more out of the running game. I’d like to see about 5 passes and 5 runs per game from that formation. It doesn’t seem like it’d be too much of a change for everyone except the C, QB, and RB.
UT_BKC - September 15, 2009
I agree the formation could be effective, even GoBR suggested utilizing it to help fix some of the running game issues. I was just pointing out a possible reason why we don’t have a wide range of formations or plays that are being used by teams across the country.
I guess you never know, we may have it in our playbook, but Davis is waiting to use it as a curveball against better competition.
Hookem4life84 - September 15, 2009
If we were working on the pisol
we would’ve had some leak about it by now. I doubt very seriously that we have devoted any time to the pistol formation.
aaronlybrand - September 15, 2009
I agree with Chris that it’s not worth spending time on if you aren’t going to use it. But, I think either he or someone else said that it would take too much time to install and I don’t believe that. Everything I’ve read indicated to me that you could put it into the offense pretty quickly and without too much trouble in timing. Not sure if that is true or not, but I would love to see it at some point. Obviously not this year, but I think it would be a massive help for a guy like Chris Whaley to run zone plays from the Pistol instead of the straight shotgun.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
Off-topic
Barring any scheduling conflicts, I will be at the Naaman Forest vs. Plano West game, or better yet, John Harris vs. Jackson Jeffcoat. I am going with a buddy who can give a pretty solid X’s and O’s report. Is there anything particular you would like me to look out for on Jeffcoat that you haven’t already seen on video?
With Harris now at QB it, there won’t be much to gain from watching him.
Hookem4life84 - September 15, 2009
Harris has been running the ball quite a bit
so you should at least get a glimpse of his speed and athleticism.
Horncasting - September 15, 2009
True..
But I saw him play a few times last year when he was still at WR, I have seen all I need from him, including speed and athleticism.
Hookem4life84 - September 15, 2009
Harris and Jeffcoat
With Harris I agree on taking a look at his athleticism and ability to make people miss. With Jeffcoat, just an overall impression on his speed and his athletic ability as well. Also, where he lines up on the field, because apparently he has been playing some defensive tackle for Plano. Basically any thoughts are valuable and if you send me an email (look on my profile), I can include whatever thoughts you or your friend have on both players in the Week 3 Wrap next Monday.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
Video
Just as an addendum, if either of you have a video camera and can get some footage of the game, that would be awesome. If so, we can discuss later how you can to get it to me. Thanks.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
Pistol not pisol
aaronlybrand - September 15, 2009
Sounds like some good italian food… mmmm….
UT_BKC - September 15, 2009
Early playing time by Freshman
Is a good thing. I agree, Mack is all in. He probably had enough of guys ending up ineligible academically or if they are good jumping off as a junior. I like seeing the young guys play, especially when they are so good. Howell is really live up to his hype.
Wrangler86 - September 15, 2009
I know the knock on Mack not playing freshmen was overblown, but...
It is great that already over half of the current freshman class has seen the field. That has to pay dividends with those few blue chippers we have missed out on in the past. I was getting tired of hearing playing time as a freshman being a big reason for choosing another school rather than Texas. While it would be great if all the freshmen proved good enough to play, I think the fact that the staff is willing to play the young guys that have proven capable in practice is an even better incentive than just getting everyone on the field for a snap or two whether they are ready (physically or mentally) to compete or not.
Rickyspub - September 15, 2009
Mack and true freshman
He’s also talked about how playing helps the kids stay motivated in the classroom and at practice. Witness DJ Monroe and his supposed 0.0 last fall (not sure if that is true or not, but that’s what the rumors have). Just another in quite a long line of advancements made by Mack over the years, which is really great to see.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
a little off-topic, but
any news on Jordan Hicks? I heard he was attending the USC game this past saturday.. wonder if that had any effect on his decision. Hopefully we’ll give a more positive impression against the implosion that CU is turning out to be.
drbadass - September 15, 2009
Hicks
He had fun a the game, got a lot of attention, blah blah blah. Nothing much to report there really.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 15, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.