The Big Picture
It probably seems rather picky to focus in on the two possessions that ended in field goals for the Longhorns on a day when the offense scored seven touchdowns and absolutely blew UTEP out of the water. However, the fact is that the home team probably should have scored 80 and could have had even more than that had Mack Brown not completely shut down the offense for the last 20 minutes or so of the game. The reason for the tough-love focus in this post is exactly the same reason that Texas won so easily -- UTEP provided so little resistance, there's really no excuse for the first-team offense not to have scored a touchdown every time they got the ball. High standards, for sure, but nothing unattainable for this offense as it gains momentum with every passing game.
Situation #1 -- Context
With Texas up 13-7 roughly halfway through the first quarter, UTEP's third possession actually included a completed pass after a fumble and three-and-out on their first two drives, but an illegal formation penalty, a run for a loss of a yard, and an incomplete pass halted the drive for the Miners and led to a punt. Unfortunately for Mike Price's team, the long snapper sent the ball over the head of the punter and into the UTEP end zone, where Malcolm Williams absolutely flattened the punter as he attempted to pick the ball up and kick it away:


Word to the wise, Greg Hiett -- what you're about to try to do is not a good idea.
So yeah, that didn't work out too well. To Hiett's credit, he did get the ball out of the end zone...
Another angle, just for fun.
The ball eventually made its way to the six yardlilne, where the Longhorns took over after UTEP recovered the ball.
1st and Goal UTEP 6
Texas comes out in 11 personnel with EBS on the line of scrimmage and Tre' Newton in the backfield on Colt McCoy's left, with John Chiles at the flanker position and James Kirkendoll as the sub-B receiver:

The Longhorns run a zone play right behind Michael Huey and Kyle Hix, the more productive side of the line early in the season, but Huey misses his block and Newton gets taken down in the backfield for a three-yard loss, another example of how one player not executing on the offensive line brings down a whole play, even if all the other players execute well. It's not even clear what Huey was doing on the play -- he has a lineman right in front of him, but starts turning right at the start of the play, even though the opposing player is coming across his left shoulder and because he is facing the wrong direction, the defender gets by him easily. Huey's footwork should have been reversed -- he should have turned his body left to pin the defender inside. It's also worth pointing out that the Longhorns faked the screen pass on this play to freeze the defenders on the back side of the play.
2nd and Goal UTEP 9
Texas stays in 11 personnel, but this time with Newton on McCoy's right side:

McCoy tries to fit the ball into Chiles, who is running a slant on the play, but a defender at the line of scrimmage tips the ball and the coverage is good by the UTEP defender -- the pass falls incomplete. Had McCoy waited another split second -- and he could have because the protection, he would have had Tre' Newton in the flat on his right and Newton might have scored a touchdown because there were not any defenders within 10 yards of him and Jordan Shipley took the cornerback (and possibly the safety) into the end zone in man coverage, meaning the UTEP player had his back turned to the play:

3rd and Goal UTEP 9
Greg Davis sends Dan Buckner into the game, replacing EBS, leaving the Longhorns in their best version of 11 personnel, with Buckner at the flex position and Tre' Newton lined up on McCoy's right:

James Kirkendoll runs a slant and McCoy hits him short of the goalline, forcing the Longhorns to attempt a field goal. Just like the last play, Tre' Newton was open coming out of the backfield, but the best play was to a wide open Dan Buckner running a post behind the defender who eventually came up to tackle Kirkendoll short of the goalline:

Final Totals
Three plays for three yards, 1:25 expired. One of two passing for McCoy for six yards. One catch for six yards for James Kirkendoll. One carry for negative three yards for Tre' Newton. One missed block by Michael Huey.
The Verdict
Against a completely overmatched UTEP team, not being able to score from the six yardline is unacceptable. The missed block by Michael Huey epitomizes the work of the offensive line through four games -- mental and physical breakdowns happen by individual players way too often. Comparing the second and third plays shows just how big of a difference there is between EBS and Dan Buckner -- EBS can't create separation on his route, but Dan Buckner easily gets open in the back of the end zone. If the Longhorns are going to throw the football -- and there was little doubt they would do so with second and goal from the nine yardline -- Buckner must be in the football game.
This drive also demonstrates that Newton should be catching a few more balls out of the backfield because he was open on his relase on the second and third plays. It could be that McCoy doesn't totally trust him catching the ball because of his drop against Wyoming and a busted play on a hand off last week against Texas Tech. As well as McCoy played on Saturday, and he played extremely well, there is still some room for improvement in going through his reads, particularly in looking for Buckner up the seam because teams are really have a difficult time defending him on those plays.
Situation #2 -- Context
Up 23-7 with the clock under three minutes in the first quarter, the Longhorn defense gave up a rare first down, but then defended a screen well for a two-yard loss, forced an incomplete pass, and stopped another completed pass short of the first-down marker to force a punt. A 35-yard punt by Greg Hiett gives the Longhorns the ball at their own 23 yardline after a one-yard return by Jordan Shipley.
1st and 10 Texas 23
The Longhorns start the drive in 11 personnel, with EBS on the line of scrimmage and Tre' Newton in the backfield on the right of Colt McCoy:

McCoy drops back to pass and receives good protection, but can't find anyone open down field. Stepping up in the pocket, he does an excellent job of keeping his eyes downfield looking for a big play, but finally pulls the ball down and runs left and picks up nine yards before making a smart decision and sliding just short of the first down.
2nd and 1 Texas 32
The Longhorns go into their jet tempo and under center (I believe) after the run by McCoy, but the cameras don't catch the start of the play. Jordan Shipley, Adam Ulatoski, and Charlie Tanner all get excellent blocks on the play, as Tre' Newton picks up seven yards running behind the left side of the line.
1st and 10 Texas 39
Going no huddle, Greg Davis sends Dan Buckner, Marquise Goodwin, and DJ Monroe onto the field in an 11 personnel, empty set:

McCoy fakes the screen right to Goodwin to freeze the backside pursuit, then throws the screen left to John Chiles. Jordan Shipley blocks the cornerback defending Chiles and Charlie Tanner and David Snow get out in front of Chiles to lead him downfield for a 27-yard gain:

Excellent play design and excellent execution by the Longhorns.
1st and 10 UTEP 34
Hustling downfield and going under center in the jet tempo, the Longhorns hike the ball quickly out of their 11 personnel set with Tre' Newton back on the field, who picks up six yards running behind the left side of the Texas line and excellent blocks from Adam Ulatoski, Charlie Tanner, and Jordan Shipley. Tanner did a nice job of holding the defender long enough to let Newton get by, but released the defender quickly enough that no flags were thrown on the play, while Ulatoski showed good feet by getting to the second level and allowing Newton to pick up yardage unmolested.
2nd and 4 UTEP 28
With the Longhorns in the WildHorn formation, a UTEP defender gets a little too excited and jumps across the line of scrimmage, contacting Kyle Hix. Five-yard penalty, first down.
1st and 10 UTEP 23
Texas comes back with their best personnel package -- 11, with Buckner in the flex position and Tre' Newton on McCoy's left:

McCoy sees Shipley with one-on-one coverage with only one safety back in the middle of the field and probably makes up his mind to throw the pass to his roommate before the snap. The throw does indeed go to Shipley at the pylon and falls incomplete, but the UTEP cornerback gets flagged for pass interference -- 15 yards for Texas, first down.
1st and Goal UTEP 7
In a somewhat unusual move, Texas stays with Dan Buckner in the flex instead of bringing in EBS inside the 10 yardline, as they often do:

With McCoy rolling right at the snap, John Chiles runs a slant in an attempt to pick off the defender trying to chase Dan Buckner into the flat, where McCoy finds him for a three-yard gain. A good thought on the play call, but Buckner couldn't outrun the defensive back to the corner of the end zone and Chiles didn't quite get in that defender's way well enough.
2nd and Goal UTEP 4
Starting the second quarter, the Longhorns go WildHorn with John Chiles behind center:

Chiles runs the quarterback counter play that picked up big yardage last week and might have scored a touchdown, except Charlie Tanner blocks the safety farther away from the ball, instead of the linebacker closer to the play and that player eventually tackles Chiles for a one-yard gain:
3rd and Goal UTEP 3
Texas goes back to 11 personnel with Buckner in the flex and Newton on McCoy's right:

Kirkendoll runs a nice route, taking several steps out into the flat, then pivoting and running a slant across the goalline, creating enough separation for McCoy to throw him the ball, but Kirkendoll drops it after having it hit his hands. Once again, Buckner is open in the back of the end zone, but McCoy made the easy throw to Kirkendoll, who should have caught the ball.
Final Totals
Seven plays, 74 yards, 3:01 expired. Two of three passing for McCoy for 30 yards. One rush for nine yards by McCoy. One rush for one yard by Chiles. Two carries for 13 yards by Newton. Two penalties for 20 yards on UTEP. Three good blocks by Jordan Shipley and two good blocks by Adam Ulatoski and Charlie Tanner, who made a poor decision on the WildHorn play and picked the wrong defender to block. One dropped pass by James Kirkendoll that should have resulted in a touchdown.
The Verdict
For the most part, this was an excellent drive by the Longhorns, who marched right down the field until stalling inside the 10 yardline before the missed block by Tanner and the dropped pass derailed the drive. The good news is that the Longhorns conintued to run the football well in their jet tempo offense and the left side of the Texas ilne blocked much better on this drive than they did in the first two games of the season. No longer is there a sharp difference between running right and running left, due in large part to more consistent play by Charlie Tanner and much, much better run blocking by Adam Ulatoski. The screen passing game to Chiles continues to work well and the fake screen to the other side of hte field probably helped Chiles pick up an extra 5-10 yards by slowing down the backside pursuit, a nice wrinkle.
0 recs | 24 comments
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who saw these two nitpicks
I imagine Colt will have these errors pointed out to him during the off-week, and he won’t make but maybe one similar mistake in his next game.
I don’t mind criticizing perfection like this with Colt; I just temper it with not being too upset if things don’t work out. He’s a good kid who works damn hard, and when he’s firing on all cylinders he’s unstoppable and a blast to watch. You wanna see your guy always do better, and so it’s also fun to see where mistakes are made and watch him learn and improve over the season when he fixes them.
Great post, Senor GBR.
TXinDC - September 28, 2009
Pardon my ignorance
But what is the definition of N-personnel? I have only seen it used where N = 11.
pleaseplaykindle - September 29, 2009
First numeral is the number of running backs
the second numeral is the number of tight ends. Greg Davis definitely prefers 11 personnel, in part because of the extra blocking surface that the tight end provides. Sometimes, with certain tight ends, that’s about all they provide.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 29, 2009
Silver linings
TXinDC pretty well covered it, the positive of the negative is the ability for the staff to “coach up” mistakes that in the end didn’t cost us (unless you bet the over and had 75)
Still, this makes for a facinating read and helps us mear mortals better understand the “action on the field”
echeese - September 29, 2009
Thanks
Hope it does help.
I think the coaches would tell you that it’s pretty much impossible for a team to play a perfect game and as long as they win, they would probably prefer some mistakes so they can use that as motivation during the week and keep the players from getting complacent.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 29, 2009
thanks
the pictures really help
Crimson Fog - September 29, 2009
Fake screen one side, throw the screen to the other
This is a nice play to run every now and then but you don’t want to get too cute with it. Back in 1990 a team was absolutely killing UT with this play (I want to say it was either OU or UH). Tight ball game in the 4th quarter, they run it for what seems like the 6th or 7th time in the game and our DB (Lance Gunn, maybe) jumps it and scores and we end up pulling the upset.
Horncasting - September 29, 2009
Later in the game
they did the same thing but then threw a 10 yard post to the other side, which resulted in a big gain. Both plays are like play action passes.
Wells - September 29, 2009
That would have been Cougar High in 92. nt.
Bevoboy94 - September 29, 2009
Texas #1 in Red Zone Offense
Ghost, I like your insight and use of screenshots, for the past few years, Texas has set the standard for red zone offense. This year, they’re #1. Red Zone Efficiency
It’s hard to be beyond perfect. Perhaps you should’ve analzyed our kick coverage, which is average.
Eskimohorn - September 29, 2009
Interesting table
but Kansas is more efficient than us. More points (1), fewer opportunities (-1), more points per opportunity (0.308).
/Devil’s advocate.
Our kick coverage does need improvement.
afrokinger - September 29, 2009
a few notes on personnel
when texas flexes Buckner out from TE, that is no longer 11 personnel, it is 10 personnel
The above is 10 personnel.
Also:
This is not “11 personnel, empty set”, it is 0 personnel, because there are no backs in the backfield, and no TE aligned on the line. The fact that there is a tailback and TE on the field split out does not make it 11 personnel, because in this formation, they are wide receivers.
I wonder when teams are going to realize that John Chiles will never pass from the Wildhorn formation, and defend him accordingly.
Beergut - September 29, 2009
We're saving it for you. Just ot piss you off. nt
whills - September 29, 2009
I believe that's actually 72 personnel.
Never heard of it? Well, I decided on my own that I’m going to call it whatever I want to even though the rules of football nomenclature dictate otherwise. I mean, why should I hold myself to some arbitrary convention like football nomenclature or, to use a broader example, capitalization, when I can just do whatever I want to do, no matter how stupid and nonsensical it is?
I mean sure, it’s idiotic, childish and doesn’t make any sense, but hey, the only bad thing to come out of that is that absolutely no one will ever take me seriously about anything because I’m being so monstrously stupid about this one particular thing. But what do I care about that? It’s not like I just post on this blog because I desperately need to show the world that I know more about football than they do, but the very method by which I go about doing so undermines that goal from the get-go!
billyzane - September 29, 2009
I fear you're too subtle BZ
but I applaud your efforts none the less.
learned hand - September 29, 2009
you are way too obsessed with a single letter
GoBR and I are discussing football.
If you don’t want to discuss football, fine, you can go sit in the corner and piss and moan about your obsession with one single letter. Your lack of contributions to the discussion will not be missed.
Beergut - September 30, 2009
If by "talking football" you mean...
“Reading everything I can and commenting ONLY on things that other people got wrong on those posts so I look smart” then, yes. I have no interest in entering that conversation.
billyzane - September 30, 2009
it has nothing to do with "looking smart"
it has to do with wanting people to get the correct information
I don’t think Wescott’s feelings are hurt by me giving him the correct terminology, nor do I think he believes I’m trying to “look smart” at his expense.
The only person who seems to have an issue here is you, and that has more to do with your obsession with a letter than it does with any desire to contribute to the discussion.
Beergut - October 1, 2009
I have a problem with it.
Wells - October 2, 2009
"Only" doesn't mean what Beergut thinks it means.
learned hand - October 2, 2009
Roughing the Punter
I was thinking about that hit by Malcolm Williams on the punter. He didn’t touch the ball, Williams just blasted the punter. Is there a rule that the ball must pass the line of scrimmage regardless of whether or not the punt blocker touches it to not be roughing the punter?
aaronlybrand - September 30, 2009
I believe b/c the punter tried to recover the ball to punt it again
it is not roughing to tackle him.
It may also have to do with the bal beng live since it hit the ground.
The Miners punter either panicked or was poorly coached, b/c he should have just thrown the bal out of the back of the endzone and taken the safety rather than try to punt it again.
Beergut - September 30, 2009
damn typos. ball* nt
Beergut - September 30, 2009
It is the live ball
once the ball hits the ground the punter loses his protection.
Wells - September 30, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.