Monroe provides spark for offense. It didn't take long for D.J. Monroe to make an impact on the Longhorn football team. A little less than ten seconds, to be exact. That's roughly the amount of time it took the former high school track star to find the end zone after receiving monster blocks from Tre' Newton and Malcolm Wiliams on his first kick off return in college. His first touch in college, even. The coaches want to limit Shipley's work in the kicking game and Monroe's first effort cemented, at the very least, a few more chances for the dynamic speedster to return kicks.
Monroe was equally impressive running the football. His second touch only minutes of game time later resulted in a nine-yard run and guaranteed that the Texas coaching staff would receive approximately one million questions how they plan to use Monroe going forward. The excitement about Monroe running the football stems not only from his insane speed (best 100m time: 10.08), but also from his incredibly quick feet. After two years of complaining about Texas running backs not fitting into the zone-blocking scheme, Monroe's ability to plant and cut and take the corner against virtually any defender screams, "Savior!"
In only 12 plays on the field, Monroe had nine carries for 64 yards, an average of 7.1 yards per carry. At roughly 170 pounds, Monroe also showed a little bit of toughness, taking on several defenders on one run instead of meekly heading out of bounds. The coaches are still concerned about his ability in pass protection and that is certainly warranted, but Greg Davis said after the game that they would continue to expand the number of plays in Monroe's package as he becomes more acclimated to the running game. More, please.

So much for the redshirt. Marquise Goodwin wasn't supposed to see the field for the Longhorns this season. After all, the coaches didn't even know how committed he would be to football in college. It's not that they thought he wasn't a football player or didn't like the game, it's just that he has a shot at the 2012 Olympic team as a world-class athlete in the triple jump and long jump. He didn't participate in spring practice or in summer workouts, showing up to fall practice well behind every other receiver on the team, even fellow freshman Greg Timmons.
Well, it didn't take long for Goodwin to lose his redshirt and make a difference on the field for the Longhorns. Entering the game as part of the second-team unit with Garrett Gilbert, Goodwin quickly established himself as Gilbert's favorite target, catching three passes for 39 yards on the drive, including a 29-yard screen pass that he almost broke down the sideline for a touchdown, and, judging by his expression of frustration afterwards, felt like he should have.
Perhaps it's no surprise that Goodwin played in the first game, considering how much receivers coach Bobby Kennedy raved about him during an interview last week:
Marquise is a doing good job. Obviously, he's real fast, and he catches the ball very naturally. That's what is exciting for me because you do see him snatch the ball. The speed coupled with pretty good hands, he's by no means a finished product, but I see good improvement out of him. He's been a pleasant surprise. He was a good high school player, obviously an outstanding track athlete, a world-class track athlete. I see him getting better every day.
If Brandon Collins loses his appeal to regain his eligibility this fall, Goodwin could be one of the players who steps up and earns a larger than expected role on the football team. His debut on Saturday certainly looked like a preview of a lot of good things to come.
Tracking: 'Horns continue third-down success. Part of the reason the Longhorn offense was so successful last season was the uncanny ability to convert not only third-down situations, but also third-and-long situations. Overall, Texas converted 55% of all third downs and 48% of third-and-longs, defined as needing seven or more yards. Championship level, according to Greg Davis ($), is converting 33% of third-and-longs, leading Davis to call the performance by Colt McCoy and company in those situations last year "off the chart."
It's difficult to say whether Texas can continue to convert at that insanely high rate throughout the 2009 season, but the early returns look promising. Against Louisiana-Monroe, the Longhorns went 9 of 14 on third downs, good for a conversion rate of 64%, nearly ten percent better than last year's strong numbers. On Saturday, McCoy and the first team converted 7 of 12, including 2 of 4 on third-and-long, once completing a pass to James Kirkendoll and once completing a pass to John Chiles to set up Jordan Shipley's long touchdown catch the following play.
One of the major questions surrounding Texas this season is whether or not McCoy can continue to convert third downs at such a high rate without Quan Cosby, who was second on the team in converting 14 third downs (seven third-and-long) on 17 passes thrown in his direction. Jordan Shipley lead the team in that category, catching 19 passes on third down (all for first downs) on 24 passes thrown to him. The bad news is that Brandon Collins became an increasingly reliable option for McCoy as the season wore on, including three in the last two games.
Saturday night indicated that McCoy has developed a better connection with James Kirkendoll, who caught both of his passes on third down and moved the chains both times. John Chiles is another candidate to step up and use his size and strength to muscle defenders after catching one third-down pass to move the chains. But will a running back step up to become a reliable target on third down? Chris Ogbonnaya converted six third downs last season and Vondrell McGeeisn't known as being even close to Ogbonnaya as a receiver out of the backfield.
The verdict: the Longhorns should continue to convert third downs at a high rate this season with the return of Shipley and a greater level of comfort between McCoy and Kirkendoll and McCoy and Chiles. However, one major area of concern from the first game is that two of the three turnovers came on third down. Were the Longhorns pressing?
Tracking: Defensive tackles. Lamarr Houston had an excellent game as a disruptive force, posting four tackles, with one made behind the line of scrimmage. On the first touchdown run by Cody Johnson, Houston made a big-league block on a poor ULM player to spring Johnson into the end zone. Good start to the season for the senior who should be much more active this season as long as he stays healthy, something he wasn't able to do last season.
The rest of the defensive tackles were a little bit more of a mixed bag. Kheeston Randall made two tackles, but struggled once again at times with losing his leverage and also had a roughing the passer penalty. There are going to be some growing pains early in the season, but improved performances from him are going to be necessary for the Longhorns to make it to Pasadena.
Ben Alexander looked exactly like the player everyone thinks he is -- a run stuffer and little more. Will Muschamp isn't going to ask him to do much more than hold the point of attack and take up blockers to keep the linebackers free to make plays. So far so good.
Calvin Howell. Well, he's certainly aggressive. The true freshman committed two penalties in limited action, hitting the quarterback late once and grabbing a facemask on the other. He made one tackle but also struggled with his leverage times. Like Randall, improvement from Howell will help dictate how well the interior of the defense plays this season and whether or not the Longhorns can go undefeated.
Buckner elevates game. It's a good thing the Longhorn roster is practically overflowing with receivers. After DJ Grant went down early in fall practice, the team had to find a replacement at the flex tight end position. Even with the weight loss by Greg Smith, it's been clear for some time that Texas won't have traditional options at the position this season.
Enter Dan Buckner. Buried at the wide receiver position ever since he lost Colt McCoy's trust early last season by not fighting off the line of scrimmage, a play that resulted in McCoy's first interception of the season against UTEP, Buckner's switch to the flex tight end position has reinvigorated his young career at UT. The returns against Louisiana-Monroe were almost immediate -- Buckner caught McCoy's second pass attempt of the season and was targeted on two of McCoy's first five attempts. His five catches for 62 yards (including a 30-yard catch) were good enough to finish second on the team in receptions on the day.
Of course, playing in the flex position requires more than just earning the quarterback's trust and catching passes. To truly benefit the offense, Buckner needs to block well at the position as well, part of the reason Shipley likely won't see much time there this season. In his first live action there, Buckner blocked well and showed that he will not be a liability blocking there, no real surprise considering his size and improved strength, but heartening given that he struggled with physical cornerbacks last season and will be blocking larger players at the position this season.
All things considered, Dan Buckner's debut at the flex tight end position was an unmitigated success and means that the Longhorns can continue to use Greg Smith primarily in short-yardage and goalline situations this seasons -- the position at whih he can most positively impact the team. Maybe the tight end position isn't such a concern after all.
0 recs | 59 comments
Gotta love me some
Football Season Morning Coffee. Or Morning Bloody Mary, depending on how your Labor Day went.
kriess - September 8, 2009
Im just gonna say this once:
Sweet grandpa’s ghost we have a whole stable full of talented running backs!!!!!!!
Newton
Hills
Monroe
Whittaker
McGee
Johnson
with Whaley on the bench
All of these guys would start on any other Texas team (save A&M with Christine Michael and U of H with Bryce Beall). This has got to be the deepest RB corps ive seen in a lonnnnnnnng time!
greenspointexas - September 8, 2009
Batch, Beall, Finley, and Michael are all pretty good RBs. It’s probably reasonable to say that a guy who hasn’t done much of anything at UT (yet) wouldn’t start over those guys. And for Tech’s system, I’d rather have Batch or Jeffers than most of the UT backs. No shame in that, though.
burntorangehorn - September 9, 2009
Do you have a day job GoBR?
You’re always pitching outstanding stuff on this site, and lots of it. Where do you find the time??
On Calvin H… do I remember you describing him as having a very high football IQ when he committed? Seems like it was him. If so, then his learning curve over the first 3 games should remarkable.
patienthornsfan - September 8, 2009
Part-time job
and then my writing over at the Examiner, though that doesn’t help much unless I get a lot of traffic. Trying to find something else right now but it’s a tough market.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 8, 2009
Have you considered freelance?
The Houston Chronicle & San Antonio Express could use a contributor with your talent and team insight. I would love to see a weekly editorial worthy of the Burnt Orange Nation.
Best wishes on whatever you try and we appreciate all you do for the BON.
orangetower - September 9, 2009
Other questions as well:
Where the heck was Malcom Williams??? Am I the only one concerned here?
Do our DB’s have hands like bricks? I counted at least 2-3 easy dropped interceptions that game. I thought Muschamp said we were gonna improve this year in take aways. Not so, thus far
greenspointexas - September 8, 2009
Concern
GPT: we had to go over this in hoops season, and we’ve got a long way to go with football so let’s get this out of the way now — try toning down, WAY DOWN, the commentary. This Fan Shot is a perfect example: when you make a single observation and jump to a gigantic conclusion, you mostly just invalidate the seriousness with which someone should consider your observation.
Similarly, here, pounding violently the panic button about Malcolm Williams, or the team’s turnover ratio, is premature. Try to be a little more measured. People might listen to you if you do.
Peter Bean - September 8, 2009
Apologies
It has been pointed out to me that the tone of my response is unnecessarily abrasive and harsh on GPT. For that I apologize.
I did, and still do, want to communicate to GPT (and others) that there are productive ways to discuss what we see on the field, and hyperbolic reactions that undermine the discussion. Nevertheless, to make that point rudely just as unhelpfully undermines positive discussion — I apologize, sir.
Peter Bean - September 8, 2009
I do apologize as well
due to my history and the nature of some of my posts, I totally understand your comments above and dont blame you
hook em
greenspointexas - September 8, 2009
Kumbaya
Peter Bean - September 8, 2009
This is one of the things that makes us the best online community in the blogosphere.
patienthornsfan - September 9, 2009
Answers
I’m concerned about Malcolm, too. It is great that Chiles was able to out compete Malcolm in practice to get most of the snaps at the WR position he splits with Malcolm but…I am really hoping that this is the year Malcolm becomes a super star and he is not off to a good start. The good thing is that Malcolm has plenty of competition to motivate him. Some day Malcolm is going to get it together and be all world but last Saturday was not that day.
The old joke about DBs is that if they could catch the ball they would be playing WR. The UT DBs dropped quite a few possible interceptions last season so I was hoping to see a big improvement in that area this season.
Kafka - September 8, 2009
thanks kafka, hopefully i think that the DB's should get it together as the season goes on
all i did was ask. sorry if I put too many question marks in there
greenspointexas - September 8, 2009
DB's hands
The odd thing IMO is that we’ve got one of the DB’s returning punts.
Horncasting - September 8, 2009
Good when there is a fake punt
It is nice to have a safety back there returning punts just in case the opposition fakes the punt or mishandles the snap. To me, catching a punt is tougher than catching your typical pass. The pass usually has a nice spiral that makes it easy to figure out how to position your hands optimally. Also, the punts are a lot higher and therefore more subject to the vagaries of the winds than passes.
Some of those DB must have good hands, I guess Mack should put one of the those DBs back there to return punts.
Kafka - September 8, 2009
What's really exciting about Monroe is...
… even if the play isn’t designed for him, he’s still going to have Defensive Coordinators wetting their pants every time he’s on the field now.
patienthornsfan - September 8, 2009
Yup
That’s part of the reason why he needs to become at least average when it comes to blocking/blitz pick-up. It won’t do us much good to only have him out there on plays when he gets the ball. We need him to be out there many other plays each game, possibly drawing a linebacker or safety away from another target.
BigTexBD - September 8, 2009
Blocking at 170 pounds
Don’t think that DJ is going to be average at blocking/blitz pickup as long as he weighs only 170 pounds, it is a matter of physics. It is up to GD to figure out how to get DJ on the field but the obvious approach is to line him up in the slot and let him participate in the run game from the slot and also throw short passes to him in space.
If DJ is lined up at TB and either he runs the ball or Colt throws the ball very quickly, DJ’s lack if blocking ability won’t be an issue. If Colt needs to throw long he could either play action fake or roll out to get some time.
Kafka - September 8, 2009
Can we say "jet sweep"? Can't remember the last time we ran one of those...
TXinDC - September 8, 2009
Jet Sweep
Would love to see that with Monroe. He can accelerate so quickly that he fits in our scheme, but getting him the ball when he’s already got a head start. Really hope we add that.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 8, 2009
Monroe was in on the TD pass to Chiles
Davis used some misdirection and had him coming from left to right in front of Colt prior to the snap. At least a couple defenders took their first step in that direction before Colt fired to Chiles on the left sideline.
Horncasting - September 8, 2009
BTW
… has anyone checked out the updated depth chart yet?
patienthornsfan - September 8, 2009
The David Snow era begins
Peter Bean - September 8, 2009
… as does the DJ Monroe era.
patienthornsfan - September 8, 2009
and maybe the Mason Walters era
Rotate the kid in to get some fresh legs on the line. It’d be good for him.
kriess - September 8, 2009
Wonder if he’ll win a job for good. He can compete with any of the other three interior linemen, so it’ll be interested to see what happens when Huey returns.
Apparently Tray Allen is full-time at guard again. I consider that good news.
burntorangehorn - September 8, 2009
Agreed.
While Tray has been a disappointment as a Tackle, no reason he couldn’t be a solid guard for us.
ctex80 - September 8, 2009
Oooh la la.
I’m just as excited this game as last to see the 2nd team come on – to see what Garrett can do again, but also to see what DeSean Hales can make happen at the Z spot. Could be really interesting to see our Triumvirate of Undersized Guys (Hales, Monroe, Goodwin) all on the field at once.
TXinDC - September 8, 2009
Need to find a nickname for them.
I was trying to think of one the other day, but couldn’t come up with any.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 8, 2009
"A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man."
SelimSivad - September 8, 2009
The Lollipop Guild
andmyster - September 8, 2009
Bravo.
ctex80 - September 8, 2009
I was thinking “rugrats.” You know, referring not only to their small stature, but also the rug that is now the surface at DKR.
Ehm…nevermind. Abort.
burntorangehorn - September 8, 2009
Mighty Mites?
patienthornsfan - September 9, 2009
That's a good one!
TXinDC - September 9, 2009
Short Horns? nt
Rickyspub - September 9, 2009
Smurfs
run Bevo run - September 9, 2009
No Collins, Beasley, or Scott
The three players ineligible for last weeks game are also not listed on the depth chart for this week. It doesn’t look like this NCAA issue is going to be resolved before Wyoming.
aaronlybrand - September 8, 2009
Does anybody think it's problematic...
… that E. Acho and K. Robinson are back-ups for each other? I mean, if one of them goes down, and you move the back-up over, then you still have a hole to fill if you want 3 LBs out there. Just wondering.
SelimSivad - September 8, 2009
I was thinking the same thing...
…I wonder if it’s the lack of trust with the backups behind the guys or a lack of depth.
vy til i die - September 9, 2009
Mr. Third Down
That is just sick! Think Mr. Shipley knows where the yard markers are?
GoBR – great write up as usual.
Horncasting - September 8, 2009
I feel like a star has been born! I really hope Monroe gets to see the field early and often, especially if Fozzy doesn’t play.
PineypointG - September 8, 2009
"If Brandon Collins loses his appeal to regain his eligibility this fall"
Maybe I am reading something into the quote or missed an announcement, but has Collins officially been ruled ineligible? Your use of the word appeal implies that.
Arroyo Grande - September 8, 2009
Appeal
From what I understand, all three players are appealing to regain their eligibility this fall — they have to go through the NCAA Clearinghouse like incoming players. That’s my understanding of the situation.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 8, 2009
Progress toward Degree Requirements
We are not going to hear anything officially from UT because of academic privacy issues, but it sounds like the Athletic Department applied for waivers of the NCAA Progress toward Degree requirements for several players and all but one of the waivers were denied.
Waiver applications are submitted to the NCAA Academic and Membership Affairs staff which has seven calendar days to process a waiver request and make a decision.
The player can appeal a waiver denial to the Progress-Toward-Degree Waiver Committee. When an appeal if filed, the NCAA staff sends a written report explaining the reasons for its decision to the Appeals committee setting out the relevant regulations and detailing the information it relied on. The Appeal Committee is required to “expeditiously reach a decision.”
Collins, Scott and Beasley are apparently appealing waiver denials. At least that is what I think is happening. Here is a link to the guidelines.
Arroyo Grande - September 8, 2009
Forgot the link. . .
http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/AMA/PTD/2009-10%20PTD%20Waiver%20Full%20Instructions.pdf
Arroyo Grande - September 8, 2009
Thanks for the information.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - September 9, 2009
Monroe and Goodwin give us great speed
Furthermore, I hope Shipley showed everyone not to underestimate his speed either. He’s not big like Malcolm Williams but he has the wheels to go deep. It’s exciting to see and gives us a whole new dimension to our offense that was missing after Charles left.
One thing I’m wondering is how good Monroe will be against better defenses. He danced a bit on one play and got tackled for a loss, and he is rather small. I hope he doesn’t turn out to be fumble prone either, although McGee is the one that screwed up in that department on Saturday.
I would still prefer to have Collins back, as well as the other two. We have the depth to cover for it, but it sucks losing players who were going to be big contributors. After all, we lost Ramonce Taylor in 2006, and while we had the depth to cover that up, he was still missed. If I had to rank who I’d want back most, I’d go with 1. Collins 2. Scott 3. Beasley, but I want all of them back. Disappointing.
TheElusiveShadow - September 8, 2009
Scott, Beasley, Collins
The horns will be OK without Collins but losing Scott could be a big problem. There are not many safeties who can both cover and hit like Scott. Beasley is more expendable than Scott but would still be a serious loss.
Kafka - September 8, 2009
Jared Norton??? sacks?
where’s norton fit in?
was anyone else a little suprised we ended up without any sacks?
gabriel o - September 8, 2009
Sacks
We didn’t have any sacks last year in the opening game against Floriday Atlantic either. It was a little surprising though.
Arroyo Grande - September 8, 2009
There were a few tackles for losses though
It’s only a matter of time before some of those turn into sacks, right?
notsofst - September 8, 2009
A lot of the knockdowns might, too.
It’s amazing that UT went on to lead the nation in that dept. even after putting up zero in week one. It makes the ULM game a little less disappointing. It could just be that Muschamp’s not tipping his hand on the blitzing just yet.
burntorangehorn - September 8, 2009
Not much blitzing + weaker d-line overall
General line of thinking is that Muschamp kept the defensive playcalling very vanilla so as not to tip his hand on our package of blitzes. We can get away with that against our non-con foes, so once conference play starts (or maybe even against pass-heavy TTU and UTEP), expect to see lots of pre-snap, confusion-inducing movement and increased pressure put on opposing QBs.
BigTexBD - September 9, 2009
Mack mentioned it in his presser
said they weren’t surprised at the lack of sacks. They expected LMU to run a lot of bootlegs and quick passes because their line couldn’t defend our pass rush well.
All things considered, there’s not much to worry about here yet. The line still had some fairly decent pressure on vanilla playcalling. Don’t expect much from the Wyoming game either. Tech should be the first real test.
gwh65 - September 9, 2009
Yes we missed out on a few sacks just from not wrapping up
but for the most part the ULM qb was doing 3-step drops and getting the ball out before our d-line had a chance for the sack. And can’t forget that little backup qb who only ran the ball.
2Cor12:9 - September 9, 2009
More DJ Love from Tim Griffin
I also think Mr. Griffin reads BON:
Speedy Weapon
patienthornsfan - September 9, 2009
Okafor looked amazing
Alex Okafor appeared to have a great game and made some huge TFL highlights.
I was listening to the game on radio and he had quite a few mentions on tackles and assists. Sam Acho was “Johnny on the spot” though.
Sergio was a bit quiet for Sergio but we know the man can play. Okafor and Acho down at ends with Sergio in the Buck will be fatal for QB’s all season. Randall was in the backfield on almost every highlight i saw. How was his game overall? Has anyone seen an online replay of the game yet?
The crowd was noticeably louder as well. We are among the elite. Hook ’em.
orangetower - September 9, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.