Even in an all-star game setting, Texas commit Hassan Ridgeway was one of the most physically impressive prospects (Photo by Wescott Eberts).
Vitals
Name: Hassan Ridgeway
Position: DE
Height:6'4''
Weight: 250
Speed: 4.70
High School: Mansfield High School, Mansfield (TX)
Rating (Rivals): Four out of five (5.8)
Offers
Texas (Committed 2/16/2011)
Texas A&M
TCU
Overview/recruitment
An offer that was met with some skepticism at the time, Ridgeway looked athletic but not particularly dominant as a defensive end. Many fans chalked the offer up to minimal defensive end depth and struggles in the recruitments of the more heralded Mario Edwards and Devonte Fields (myself included). And then his senior film was released. Whatever looming questions may have been there before quickly vanished and Texas fans were instead left to conjecture just how high Ridgeway's stock would go up by the final rankings. This one turned out to be one hell of an evaluation from the staff, so mad kudos to them for getting on Hassan early and minimizing whatever doubts possibly crept into his mind about taking further visits (there was some talk he was intrigued by A&M for a while, and would check College Station out).
Bull rush: Hassan has serious beast strength for his age, which allows him to blow opposing tackles back at the quarterback while he's trying to take his drop, or merely toss them out of the way en route to the ball carrier. Once he locks his long arms onto you and gets his feet going, it's basically over. Very Alex Okafor-ish.
Frame: The dude was simply made to play football. He has an Adonis-like build that should be able to carry as much weight as the coaches could conceivably want to put on a defensive end. He's already big, but I expect him to pretty easily put on enough weight to be able to swing inside and play defensive tackle on passing downs. Some sites are saying he's a future DT full time, but I think he'll make his money on the edge.
Football IQ: Ridge seems to be a very smart football player on film. He takes great pursuit angles, never seems to overrun the play, and looks good in the zone read game—a common weakness exposed in young defensive ends and a primary point where he'll be tested in a spread-happy conference like the Big 12.
Athleticism: Just a joy to watch in the open field. That may seem like a funny comment to make about a defensive lineman, but the kid can really run in space, changes directions rather seamlessly, and just explodes into ball carriers in the backfield.
Holding the edge: Obviously if I think he has the potential to sometimes spin down to DT, it's assumed he's pretty good in the running game. Long arms, brute strength, and patience are all prerequisites for not getting blown off the ball while not necessarily trying to beat your opponent at the LOS. Hassan has all three.
Weaknesses
First step: I don't think anybody would ever qualify Ridgeway as a speed rusher or a weakside defensive end. That's just a waste of his skill set and not where he excels. Like with Mario Edwards, it's hard to ascertain how often a player is asked to hold his ground and contain the QB, and how often he just isn't that quick off the ball. I tend to think that if a player has a decent first step, their coach is going to showcase it. Ridgeway is more fast (at least for a DE) than quick, and this is an area where he could become more consistent.
Pass-rushing diversity: Right now, like many high school linemen, Ridgeway has the bull rush and not much else in his repertoire. He did show a profound ability to "get skinny" and split a double team with ease in the Army All-America Bowl, however.
My Take
Hassan's athletic ability and speed, combined with his natural strength and frame, are what make him, in my opinion, a special talent. This is the kind of guy that the SEC dominates college football with. Bigger than you. More athletic than you. Plays like he hates your guts. Texas has been missing these kinds of BAMF's under Mack Brown, but we seem committed to SEC-style defense now and Ridgeway provides just that with run-stuffing ability and versatility in droves. Manny Diaz wants to "stop the run" first and "hit the quarterback" second. That's Ridge in a nutshell and Diaz will have some serious fun tinkering with his natural abilities.
BFLT and I have been discussing UT potentially moving to this new style of DL that are athletic and big enough to both pass-rush and stop the run—basically four hybrid lineman that can seamlessly line up on each spot on the line. Think Marcell Dareus or South Carolina's Melvin Ingram. The other three on that line were supposed to be Arik Armstead, Javonte Magee, and Mario Edwards, but 1/4 ain't bad, I guess.
0recs |
69
comments
Comments
Excellent additions for Texas
I’m not saying Ridgeway will be as good as Edwards or drafted as high as Fields, but he’s an elite insurance policy. If Texas is able to pick up Cottrell and Bluiett stays at DE, I like Texas’ 2013 DE class.
Add Raulerson and / or Hall and Ward in 2013 and Texas will be just fine at DE for the foreseeable future.
And to some degree it also seems like a new style of LB recruit…..how much concern is there that these types of players are not ideal for the spread attacks that make up most of the Big 12?
I have concerns about the speed on the edge we’re recruiting in this class. I have no idea what we’re doing at linebacker and I don’t think Diaz’s vision for his DL would work with a lot of the other common schemes in the Big 12.
I honestly had not considered that nightmare. As is, I see zero problem with Manny’s defense working in a spread-based Big 12. We basically saw the tip of the iceberg towards the end of last season, which was extremely impressive aside from the Baylor game. The weaknesses Baylor was so easily able to exploit (two safeties that are too slow over the top; a DL that couldn’t genuinely pass rush because RGIII is such an escape artist) will almost assuredly not be seen again on a Diaz/UT defense.
There’s a difference between big, heavy and fast and big, heavy and slow. Texas is recruiting big guys that can move. Steve Edmond for instance is excellent in coverage despite his size. Think SEC Defense fellas, not old school Big Ten.
Quick thought, a lot of people are calling out Santos because of his “poor coverage” skills. I sure as hell didn’t see that in his senior film.
I don't necessarily think poor coverage skills with a big guy
But it is tough in a very pass happy league to have a LB that is big be able to fly with these RBs or TEs that are undersized and quick. I think that translates to having Edmond and/or Santos be a 1st and 2nd down LB with someone coming to spell them on passing downs or 3rd down. Still love what they contribute though
Ok assume Edmond and Santos can only play on 1st and 2nd down
So what? If Big 12 teams are unable to run against Texas they’ll become one dimensional. THAT"S EXACTLY WHAT DIAZ WANTS! Cobbs and Hicks are more than capable of handling the nickel and dime duties at linebacker.
We did fine against the run this year without a big, heavy Mike. Diaz did fine at Miss. St. without a big heavy mike.
And the no-huddle makes substitution-based defenses a less viable strategy.
Why are we filling roster spots with players that have limited situational value?
as a fairly poor strategy. But anyways it doesn’t address my point that neither Texas last year nor Miss St. the year before needed a huge Mike to stop the run.
I’m fine if we want to play one guy in the middle that’s more of a run defender but our incoming linebacker class has 3 of them. I don’t get it.
M. Ingram – 22 rushes for 116 yards
T. Richardson – 19 rushes for 109 yards
T. Newton – 14 rushes for 39 yards
D. Monroe – 3 rushes for 33 yards
Big middle linebackers (or lack thereof) made a huge difference in this game – and, while we were within 3 points, we weren’t within three points of winning.
Saban nickel and dimed us in that game and got 5 TO’s. Eryk Anders, the 227 pound OLB, ended up leading them in tackles.
Also, their offense targeted our secondary’s run support. They weren’t isolating Muckelroy and running him over. I’ll say it again, we didn’t lose this game because Rod Muckelroy was our linebacker, nor was it because McClain was their’s.
When Colt went down he started pounding the ball and relied on his disiplined team to take advantage of a freshman QB. All he had to do was stop the run – he wasn’t worried about our passing attack.
Lest we forget, we were up by 3 points, Colt was dissecting them with his passing and we were driving for a TD when he was hurt.
Had Bama been down by 10 points, do you think Saban would have continued to pound the ball?
Those rushing stats are the same as the one we put up against Big 12 defenses. We didn’t just suddenly have rushing problems because we played Bama. We had rushing problems because of GD, our OL recruitment, RB recruitment and injury, and player development (specifically OL).
Did nobody in that game wish we had a run-stuffing MLB who could stop getting trucked by Richardson and Ingram like Muckelroy and Earnest were? It would have been a very different game, even with Colt still going down, had we had some better tacklers at the LB position. The point is not “that we had a chance to win.” The point is “our defense would have put them on lockdown.”
Saban gets his big linebackers off the field so much in his nickel and dime defenses? Or why Muschamp came in and immediately instituted the nickel defense as the answer to 3+ WR formations?
Big linebackers can rarely do the things in coverage that smaller ones can do. And while I hope Edmond proves adept in coverage, we can hardly say that he is at this point. Our sample size is miniscule.
Some teams we play most of the game in nickel. Other times like against KState we were hurting for a strong MLB force in the middle. I don’t think have two MLBs on the roster is a bad thing (I don’t see Moss or DLT becoming starters and one or the other is a future FB), its not like they’re going to be on the field at the same time.
Having Edmond on the field in between Hicks and Cobbs is a great balance between power and speed.
KSU ran for 38 yards on 39 carries. Our defense wasn’t hurting for anything in that game.
To win the Big 12 you don’t need multiple 250+ pound run stuffing MLB’s. You just don’t.
OU hasn’t had one in some time, neither does OSU have one currently. Neither were remotely hindered in winning the league.
Before Keenan Robinson and Acho Uno Ocho bulked up over the offseason to be able to hold their own better against interior rushers. 2010 definitely showed to me atleast the downfall of lacking a run-stuffing MLB, atleast situationally.
I agree with you that you don’t need “multiple 250+ pound run stuffing MLB’s” on the field at a time. But having one and a backup doesn’t seem excessive.
played much less nickel last year than Muschamp did. By late in the season Keenan Robinson was holding his own in the middle, particularly against Kansas State, which caused most of their significant damage on about three plays through the air.
I think Diaz probably played more nickel when Hicks was hurt during the middle of the season. Next season, I would expect less with Cobbs slated to play SAM.
Cal runs a lot of double TE, Power-run based offense. Thus, 3 LB’s. Rice played TE’s in the slot, thus 3 LB’s.
Given our difficulty in running zone, and the tremendous advantage of having Vaccaro as SAM and being able to play man-coverage underneath, I foresee that we play at least as much nickel.
I think Cobbs either plays Will or plays SAM in dime situations.
I think that would be true if we could teach zone adequately. In our man schemes though I think we want someone who can lock down a slot receiver. Not sure if Cobbs is that guy.
The drop off in coverage from Aaron Williams and Vaccaro to Cobbs could be significant.
every offense in the Big 12 could be different. Plus in every game we stopped the run our defense was elite. 3 people rushed for 100 yds Ganaway (152), Lawrence (106 Mizzu), and Smith (140 OSU). OU was only game we gave up pts and controlled the run. Median pts allowed when we held rush game down 16 pts, when they had a 100 rusher 38. Maybe there is some method to the Diaz madness
We underplayed the run considerably in those games, hence the large rushing totals. That was a decision on the part of Diaz to not attack their running games.
Anyways, I’m not questioning Diaz’s schemes, I’m questioning whether De La Torre, Cole, and Santos can all find roles on our team and I’m questioning whether another coordinator would have success with this group of guys.
I think both of those guys may have to be Wills because I’m not sure they can hold up in the middle and they certainly don’t have the speed to play Sam. I see a more defined role for Santos, but his lack of top-end speed could be an issue too and I agree with your above point about the hazards of counting on being able to substitute on third down in the Big 12.
I’m mildly concerned that Cole had some trouble adjusting to playing OLB at Army AA Bowl. If he’s going to start at Texas, that’s his future position or he’s playing special teams for 4 years.
DLT needs to get a try out at FB. When comparing Moss and DLT, Moss is your LB and DLT is your FB.
I liked what I saw from Santos in his senior film. He made plays from sideline to sideline, and had some nice plays in coverage. His speed should improve as he gets leaner.
I like Santos but I’m afraid that the way we’ve targeted him means we don’t have much hope for DLT or Cole providing much.
If we signed Cole just to get MBII I’m okay with that. The DLT was a bad call though, imo.
He may eventually be able to adjust to playing outside, but the 5.0 40 he ran at The Opening, coupled with the fact that he’s a bit undersized, add up to serious questions for me. Maybe Cole just had a bad day running, but add it all together and I’m much less high on him now than I was a year ago.
How else do you explain the Santos offer immediately after MEj eliminates Texas? You’d think the backup plan to MEj would be another DE, not another MLB.
He seems to play a lot faster than 5.0 on film. I think that can be attributed to a bad time. Too much gym time and not enough running. I am not saying he is going to have a 4.5 40 anytime soon, but I think the 5.0 was a fluke
Biologically, they’ve been around a while. :) I pulled mine 3 years ago (playing ultimate frisbee no less). Of course, I never went to see a doctor or got any professional treatment. And I kept running on it for the most part, so that injury lingered for like 6 months. Not too fun.
Actually a growing junior :p when you are a spry youngster, apparently if you can’t touch your toes (like me), then your bones are spongy and soft and your muscles are stronger/stiffer so they pop chunks of bone off. Not a great experience ha
I’m hopeful he might be able to play will. But that position needs to be able to play from the boundary side to make a tackle on the field side. 4.6 speed or better.
There’s a difference between big, heavy and fast and big, heavy and slow.
If it were that simple, why wasn’t Texas taking the big, heavy and fast guys previously?
The answer is that it is very rare to find a 260 lb. linebacker that can do what a 245 lb. linebacker can do in coverage and playing sideline to sideline. Same with a 290 lb. DE vs. a 270 lb. DE in terms of pass rush.
2) We wanted more of a coverage mentality, which was compounded by our having some DC switches which led to a rash of OLB’s having to play MLB.
I don’t really understand why so many people are against the run-stuffing MLB. I thought this was what people have been calling for for like 5 years now?
in what Manny is trying to do. It doesn’t seem to me that the big time SEC defenses that are taking these types of big fast guys are particularly struggling against spread teams. Not to say we should play exactly like those teams but adding a big fast kid that looks like he wants to hurt you can never be a bad thing in my book
He had some success with inside rush moves and had a sack, forced fumble. I think he showed that he can create pressure by bull rushing or by running some games twisting inside.
Excellent additions for Texas
I’m not saying Ridgeway will be as good as Edwards or drafted as high as Fields, but he’s an elite insurance policy. If Texas is able to pick up Cottrell and Bluiett stays at DE, I like Texas’ 2013 DE class.
Add Raulerson and / or Hall and Ward in 2013 and Texas will be just fine at DE for the foreseeable future.
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
but bill
we still only have the second rated class. Isnt time to panic now that we missed MEJ ?
codaxx - January 26, 2012
This is true
We are definitely not top 5 anymore according to some on here. Let’s panic
TxHorns989 - January 26, 2012
Regarding the new style of DL
And to some degree it also seems like a new style of LB recruit…..how much concern is there that these types of players are not ideal for the spread attacks that make up most of the Big 12?
Horncasting - January 26, 2012
little to none.
CMDR - January 26, 2012
Ah, should have read this
before making my comment below.
I have concerns about the speed on the edge we’re recruiting in this class. I have no idea what we’re doing at linebacker and I don’t think Diaz’s vision for his DL would work with a lot of the other common schemes in the Big 12.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
This kid almost has LB credentials
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
Run-stuffing DL
Makes me nervous but I think Diaz is confident in creating pass-rush with protection-busting blitz packages and not needing Cover-2 DE’s.
If we have to replace Diaz with more of a Cover-2 guy we may be wishing we’d found some lighter pass-rush specialists though.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
Love
the Ridgeway take though and I believe in Diaz’s system.
He’s been taking and building a defense that might struggle under another scheme though.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
though
fact he is looking at a big home and recruiting players that fit his scheme should make us happy.
codaxx - January 26, 2012
Excellent point about replacing Diaz
I honestly had not considered that nightmare. As is, I see zero problem with Manny’s defense working in a spread-based Big 12. We basically saw the tip of the iceberg towards the end of last season, which was extremely impressive aside from the Baylor game. The weaknesses Baylor was so easily able to exploit (two safeties that are too slow over the top; a DL that couldn’t genuinely pass rush because RGIII is such an escape artist) will almost assuredly not be seen again on a Diaz/UT defense.
GoHornsGo90 - January 28, 2012
Clarification
There’s a difference between big, heavy and fast and big, heavy and slow. Texas is recruiting big guys that can move. Steve Edmond for instance is excellent in coverage despite his size. Think SEC Defense fellas, not old school Big Ten.
Quick thought, a lot of people are calling out Santos because of his “poor coverage” skills. I sure as hell didn’t see that in his senior film.
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
I don't necessarily think poor coverage skills with a big guy
But it is tough in a very pass happy league to have a LB that is big be able to fly with these RBs or TEs that are undersized and quick. I think that translates to having Edmond and/or Santos be a 1st and 2nd down LB with someone coming to spell them on passing downs or 3rd down. Still love what they contribute though
armsch - January 26, 2012
Ok assume Edmond and Santos can only play on 1st and 2nd down
So what? If Big 12 teams are unable to run against Texas they’ll become one dimensional. THAT"S EXACTLY WHAT DIAZ WANTS! Cobbs and Hicks are more than capable of handling the nickel and dime duties at linebacker.
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
we need big Mikes?
We did fine against the run this year without a big, heavy Mike. Diaz did fine at Miss. St. without a big heavy mike.
And the no-huddle makes substitution-based defenses a less viable strategy.
Why are we filling roster spots with players that have limited situational value?
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
Texas is building a team to win against SEC teams
This came from Manny and Mack’s own mouths.
The Lakers didn’t build to beat the Trailblazers in the 80s, they built to beat the Celtics.
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
That strikes me
as a fairly poor strategy. But anyways it doesn’t address my point that neither Texas last year nor Miss St. the year before needed a huge Mike to stop the run.
I’m fine if we want to play one guy in the middle that’s more of a run defender but our incoming linebacker class has 3 of them. I don’t get it.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
No, it doesn't, if you think about skill level
Santos would be the only one. There is a good chance DLT and Cole are reserves. DLT I’m not going to get into. Cole was necessary to get Malcom Brown.
GoHornsGo90 - January 28, 2012
ummm, do you remember the last MNC game we played in?
UTLawGrad - January 26, 2012
What about it?
You mean the one we came within 3 points of winning with an inept QB?
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
Top 2 rushers for both teams:
M. Ingram – 22 rushes for 116 yards
T. Richardson – 19 rushes for 109 yards
T. Newton – 14 rushes for 39 yards
D. Monroe – 3 rushes for 33 yards
Big middle linebackers (or lack thereof) made a huge difference in this game – and, while we were within 3 points, we weren’t within three points of winning.
UTLawGrad - January 26, 2012
Statistics that are skewed by a total lack of fear of our offense.
That whole dynamic changes if Colt wasn’t hurt.
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
Misleading
Saban nickel and dimed us in that game and got 5 TO’s. Eryk Anders, the 227 pound OLB, ended up leading them in tackles.
Also, their offense targeted our secondary’s run support. They weren’t isolating Muckelroy and running him over. I’ll say it again, we didn’t lose this game because Rod Muckelroy was our linebacker, nor was it because McClain was their’s.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
Saban did the smart thing
When Colt went down he started pounding the ball and relied on his disiplined team to take advantage of a freshman QB. All he had to do was stop the run – he wasn’t worried about our passing attack.
Lest we forget, we were up by 3 points, Colt was dissecting them with his passing and we were driving for a TD when he was hurt.
Had Bama been down by 10 points, do you think Saban would have continued to pound the ball?
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
Those rushing stats are the same as the one we put up against Big 12 defenses. We didn’t just suddenly have rushing problems because we played Bama. We had rushing problems because of GD, our OL recruitment, RB recruitment and injury, and player development (specifically OL).
UT_BKC - January 26, 2012
Try thinking about it like this
Did nobody in that game wish we had a run-stuffing MLB who could stop getting trucked by Richardson and Ingram like Muckelroy and Earnest were? It would have been a very different game, even with Colt still going down, had we had some better tacklers at the LB position. The point is not “that we had a chance to win.” The point is “our defense would have put them on lockdown.”
GoHornsGo90 - January 28, 2012
Is that why
Saban gets his big linebackers off the field so much in his nickel and dime defenses? Or why Muschamp came in and immediately instituted the nickel defense as the answer to 3+ WR formations?
Big linebackers can rarely do the things in coverage that smaller ones can do. And while I hope Edmond proves adept in coverage, we can hardly say that he is at this point. Our sample size is miniscule.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
That's why we have nickel linebackers.
I don’t think anyone’s expecting Edmond and Santos to play in nickel or their presence to hurt pass rush/coverage on passing downs.
Look no further than Peter Jinkens in this recruiting class if you’re worried we’re going to trend to big run-stuffing MLBs
CMDR - January 26, 2012
How often
are we in nickel? We recruited Edmond and Santos to play in our non-nickel packages? I hope not, that’s 3/4 of the game.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
Depends on the opponent
Some teams we play most of the game in nickel. Other times like against KState we were hurting for a strong MLB force in the middle. I don’t think have two MLBs on the roster is a bad thing (I don’t see Moss or DLT becoming starters and one or the other is a future FB), its not like they’re going to be on the field at the same time.
Having Edmond on the field in between Hicks and Cobbs is a great balance between power and speed.
CMDR - January 26, 2012
Wha?
KSU ran for 38 yards on 39 carries. Our defense wasn’t hurting for anything in that game.
To win the Big 12 you don’t need multiple 250+ pound run stuffing MLB’s. You just don’t.
OU hasn’t had one in some time, neither does OSU have one currently. Neither were remotely hindered in winning the league.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
You're right, I was more thinking of KSU in 2010
Before Keenan Robinson and Acho Uno Ocho bulked up over the offseason to be able to hold their own better against interior rushers. 2010 definitely showed to me atleast the downfall of lacking a run-stuffing MLB, atleast situationally.
I agree with you that you don’t need “multiple 250+ pound run stuffing MLB’s” on the field at a time. But having one and a backup doesn’t seem excessive.
CMDR - January 26, 2012
Diaz
played much less nickel last year than Muschamp did. By late in the season Keenan Robinson was holding his own in the middle, particularly against Kansas State, which caused most of their significant damage on about three plays through the air.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - January 26, 2012
Less nickel
Did he? Vaccaro was in the nickel for virtually every conference game, including KSU. It wasn’t my impression that we were using less nickel.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
Didn't play much nickel against Cal or Rice.
I think Diaz probably played more nickel when Hicks was hurt during the middle of the season. Next season, I would expect less with Cobbs slated to play SAM.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - January 26, 2012
Disagree
Cal runs a lot of double TE, Power-run based offense. Thus, 3 LB’s. Rice played TE’s in the slot, thus 3 LB’s.
Given our difficulty in running zone, and the tremendous advantage of having Vaccaro as SAM and being able to play man-coverage underneath, I foresee that we play at least as much nickel.
I think Cobbs either plays Will or plays SAM in dime situations.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
I think Cobb gives you versatilty
to not have to go to nickel as often. He can move like a SS
CMDR - January 26, 2012
Zone
I think that would be true if we could teach zone adequately. In our man schemes though I think we want someone who can lock down a slot receiver. Not sure if Cobbs is that guy.
The drop off in coverage from Aaron Williams and Vaccaro to Cobbs could be significant.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
in 4 yrs
every offense in the Big 12 could be different. Plus in every game we stopped the run our defense was elite. 3 people rushed for 100 yds Ganaway (152), Lawrence (106 Mizzu), and Smith (140 OSU). OU was only game we gave up pts and controlled the run. Median pts allowed when we held rush game down 16 pts, when they had a 100 rusher 38. Maybe there is some method to the Diaz madness
codaxx - January 26, 2012
OSU and Baylor
We underplayed the run considerably in those games, hence the large rushing totals. That was a decision on the part of Diaz to not attack their running games.
Anyways, I’m not questioning Diaz’s schemes, I’m questioning whether De La Torre, Cole, and Santos can all find roles on our team and I’m questioning whether another coordinator would have success with this group of guys.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
santos
I can see success, but not sure on DLT and Cole. Having larger MLB is one thing, but you will need some speed on the outside.
codaxx - January 26, 2012
my pt
was more to the fact that when Diaz can control the run with his DL it opens up his blitz package. Maybe why he seems to prefer bigger DEs
codaxx - January 26, 2012
Bingo
Stop runs up the middle, funnel the run defense outside, let the big DEs clean it up.
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
Exactly
In my opinion, our biggest weak spot on defense was up the gut runs.
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
Worried about DLT and Cole.
I think both of those guys may have to be Wills because I’m not sure they can hold up in the middle and they certainly don’t have the speed to play Sam. I see a more defined role for Santos, but his lack of top-end speed could be an issue too and I agree with your above point about the hazards of counting on being able to substitute on third down in the Big 12.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - January 26, 2012
DLT and Cole
I’m mildly concerned that Cole had some trouble adjusting to playing OLB at Army AA Bowl. If he’s going to start at Texas, that’s his future position or he’s playing special teams for 4 years.
DLT needs to get a try out at FB. When comparing Moss and DLT, Moss is your LB and DLT is your FB.
I liked what I saw from Santos in his senior film. He made plays from sideline to sideline, and had some nice plays in coverage. His speed should improve as he gets leaner.
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
Santos
I like Santos but I’m afraid that the way we’ve targeted him means we don’t have much hope for DLT or Cole providing much.
If we signed Cole just to get MBII I’m okay with that. The DLT was a bad call though, imo.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
Bingo
Didn’t see this, but posted it in response to one of your comments above.
GoHornsGo90 - January 28, 2012
Actually seriously concerned about Cole now.
He may eventually be able to adjust to playing outside, but the 5.0 40 he ran at The Opening, coupled with the fact that he’s a bit undersized, add up to serious questions for me. Maybe Cole just had a bad day running, but add it all together and I’m much less high on him now than I was a year ago.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - January 26, 2012
Cole gave us Brown
So I’m fine with him.
CMDR - January 26, 2012
Perhaps DLT was the same thing for MEj?
Just didnt’ pan out as well?
Horncasting - January 26, 2012
Its a possibility
How else do you explain the Santos offer immediately after MEj eliminates Texas? You’d think the backup plan to MEj would be another DE, not another MLB.
CMDR - January 27, 2012
5.0
He seems to play a lot faster than 5.0 on film. I think that can be attributed to a bad time. Too much gym time and not enough running. I am not saying he is going to have a 4.5 40 anytime soon, but I think the 5.0 was a fluke
codaxx - January 26, 2012
I could have sworn Cole had a hip flexor at The Opening
billfromlaketravis - January 26, 2012
hip flexors
Its an epidemic!
I never heard of a hip flexor before Mike Davis last season, and now they are everywhere.
People were freaking out about SARS and the bird flu when it turns out all this time we need to be worrying about hip flexors.
CMDR - January 26, 2012
Hip Flexors
Biologically, they’ve been around a while. :) I pulled mine 3 years ago (playing ultimate frisbee no less). Of course, I never went to see a doctor or got any professional treatment. And I kept running on it for the most part, so that injury lingered for like 6 months. Not too fun.
mwjames - January 26, 2012
Hip flexors
Are worse than breaking your hip.. I did that 3 times and it was 4-6 weeks of light activity but then I was 100%, no lingering affect.
HookemHouston - January 26, 2012 via mobile
You broke your hip THREE times?
What are you, an 85-year-old grandmother? ;)
GoHornsGo90 - January 28, 2012
Hahahah very funny...
Actually a growing junior :p when you are a spry youngster, apparently if you can’t touch your toes (like me), then your bones are spongy and soft and your muscles are stronger/stiffer so they pop chunks of bone off. Not a great experience ha
HookemHouston - January 28, 2012
Cole
I’m hopeful he might be able to play will. But that position needs to be able to play from the boundary side to make a tackle on the field side. 4.6 speed or better.
Nickel Rover - January 26, 2012
I think that really oversimplifies things
If it were that simple, why wasn’t Texas taking the big, heavy and fast guys previously?
The answer is that it is very rare to find a 260 lb. linebacker that can do what a 245 lb. linebacker can do in coverage and playing sideline to sideline. Same with a 290 lb. DE vs. a 270 lb. DE in terms of pass rush.
Horncasting - January 26, 2012
Because we simply didn't evaluate well
That and not having a good linebacker coach since forever…
sessamoid - January 26, 2012
Two reasons
1) They’re rare
2) We wanted more of a coverage mentality, which was compounded by our having some DC switches which led to a rash of OLB’s having to play MLB.
I don’t really understand why so many people are against the run-stuffing MLB. I thought this was what people have been calling for for like 5 years now?
GoHornsGo90 - January 28, 2012
I have full faith
in what Manny is trying to do. It doesn’t seem to me that the big time SEC defenses that are taking these types of big fast guys are particularly struggling against spread teams. Not to say we should play exactly like those teams but adding a big fast kid that looks like he wants to hurt you can never be a bad thing in my book
cade21 - January 26, 2012
How did Ridgway do in the all star game?
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
Flashed.
He had some success with inside rush moves and had a sack, forced fumble. I think he showed that he can create pressure by bull rushing or by running some games twisting inside.
Wescott Eberts (GoBR) - January 26, 2012
Excellent!
His clip showed he was awesome bull rushing HS kids. The real test was how he performed against elite athletes.
When discussing players like Ridgeway, Cole and Santos, it may help to consider whether we would want them playing for us or OU!
Snide Aside - January 26, 2012
HASSAN CHOP!!!
Can’t believe that I’m the first one to say this.
beast in bama - January 26, 2012
Like nt.
Ese-De-SA - January 26, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.