I am not an unfeeling robot, although I sometimes may seem to be one. The Texas loss to Baylor was hard to take, and has put me in a foul mood. That accounts for why I may have gotten a little bit snippy in the comment section of Peter's post game recap. Baylor seemed to be self-destructing in the first half, and Texas was on a roll. I was quite happy about the lead Texas had at the half. But in the second half Baylor started to take care of the ball, switched from zone defense to man-to-man, and became far more aggressive on both ends of the court. And you know what happened the rest of the way.
With two losses this week, Texas now sits with the rest of the teams on the NCAA tournament bubble. Texas does get several more opportunities to improve their resume, with a game at Kansas, as well as a good shot at a rematch with Baylor, Missouri, or Kansas in the Big 12 tournament. But truthfully, by losing to Baylor last Monday, Texas will probably need some help from other bubble teams to get to the tournament, as these upcoming games will not be at the Erwin Center. Ryan Clark of Longhorn Road Trip has been writing an excellent series of posts that follow the status of Texas' competition this year for the final few NCAA tournament spots. I read these every week, and I urge you to do so as well if you want to get more insight into what the Longhorn's chances are to make the NCAA tournament.
In this week's Inside the Numbers, I get back to basics, and focus on the games. It's all you can do after a tough loss.

Background information on the statistics is posted here and here.
|
CATEGORY |
TEXAS |
OK ST |
DIFFERENCE |
|
FGA |
57 |
41 |
16 |
|
FTA |
18 |
56 |
-38 |
|
FGA + 0.475 x FTA |
65.6 |
67.6 |
-2.0 |
|
Off Rebs |
10 |
5 |
5 |
|
TOs |
15 |
8 |
7 |
|
ORB - TO |
-5 |
-3 |
-2 |
|
TS% |
0.595 |
0.666 |
-0.071 |
|
ORB% |
30% |
22% |
|
|
TO% |
21% |
11% |
|
|
Points/100 poss |
111 |
127 |
|
There honestly isn't that much to say about this game. Sure I could spend time writing about turnovers and how Oklahoma State took care of the ball while Texas was a little careless, or the low number of offensive rebounds in this game, but that would kind of miss the point. There wasn't any way that these factors were going to matter in a game where Oklahoma State took 38 more free throw attempts than Texas. In a way, this game is just the mirror image of Texas' win from a week ago against Kansas State. The biggest difference is that Texas and Oklahoma State both shot the ball very well from the floor. I am having a really hard time envisioning scenarios where one team gets 38 more free throw attempts and still loses the game.
Aside from a few extra turnovers, the Texas offense was pretty good. As a team, Texas scored 111 points/100 possessions, which is a pretty good total. A 0.595 true shooting percentage is enough to win most games. Myck Kabongo led Texas with 8.2 Points Above Median (PAM). Sheldon McClellan and J'Covan Brown chipped in with 6.4 and 4.3 points above median, respectively.
Keiton Page had a hell of a game, with a PAM of 17.4. Let's have a look at how he did this, using the play-by-play statistics. In the table below, I compare his shooting distribution vs. Texas with his season average, taken from hoop-math.com. I have emphasized a few results in the table that I feel are of particular importance. We obviously need to start with the number of free throws. Page averages about 0.4 free throw attempts for every field goal attempt, but in this game he ended up shooting 20 free throws, leading to a FTA/FGA of 1.43. That is a really high total, clearly, and it is even more unusual for a player who doesn't go to the rim very much. We can see that Page's breakdown of shot locations wasn't all that different in this game compared with his season averages. But what was different was his shooting percentages. He hit 50% of his three point attempts and 75% of his two point jump shots. On the season, Page is making 42% of his two point jump shots and 35% of his attempts from three point range. It is also interesting that all of his made two point jump shots were assisted. This is also unusual, as normally about half of Page's made two point jump shots come off of assists.
| Feb. 18 |
Season | |
| FGA | 14 | 301 |
| TS% | 0.851 | 0.574 |
| %Shots at Rim | 14% | 10% |
| FG% at Rim | 50% | 63% |
| %Assisted at Rim | 100% | 32% |
| %Shots 2pt Jumpers | 29% | 24% |
| FG% 2pt Jumpers | 75% | 42% |
| %Assisted 2pt Jumpers | 100% | 47% |
| %Shots 3pt | 57% | 66% |
| FG% 3pt | 50% | 35% |
| %assisted 3pt | 0% | 66% |
| FTA/FGA | 1.43 | 0.39 |
| FT% | 100% | 86% |
|
CATEGORY |
TEXAS |
BAYLOR |
DIFFERENCE |
|
FGA |
52 |
55 |
-3 |
|
FTA |
20 |
29 |
-9 |
|
FGA + 0.475 x FTA |
61.5 |
68.8 |
-7.3 |
|
Off Rebs |
9 |
15 |
-6 |
|
TOs |
10 |
11 |
-1 |
|
ORB - TO |
-1 |
4 |
-5 |
|
TS% |
0.585 |
0.560 |
0.026 |
|
ORB% |
32% |
47% |
|
|
TO% |
16% |
17% |
|
|
Points/100 poss |
115 |
119 |
|
Let's keep this really simple. Texas did three things poorly in this game, which led to the loss.
1. Texas didn't box out Quncy Acy. Acy had a great game, grabbing 8 offensive rebounds, or 26% of the available offensive rebounds when he was on the court. No other Bear who logged significant minutes had an offensive rebounding percentage greater than 10%. If Texas would have held Acy to 4 offensive rebounds, they would have most likely won, as it would have cut far enough into Baylor's 7.3 shot advantage to allow Texas' true shooting percentage advantage to win out. As I always say, a 0.01 differential in TS% is worth approximately 1.3 extra shots.
Texas might have won even if they would have only taken away 3 of Acy's offensive rebounds. So many of those rebounds resulted in easy points for Baylor. Acy racked up 7.4 points above median, mostly on putbacks, dunks, and free throws. So Texas had boxed out better on Acy, not only would they have cut into some of Baylor's shot advantage, but they would have neutralized one of Baylor's most efficient scorers.
2. Texas lost track of Brady Heslip. Heslip was 4 for 5 on three point shots, with a PAM of 7.2. Many of these open looks came on really bad defensive breakdowns by Texas.
3. Texas couldn't stay in front of Pierre Jackson, and sent him to the line 12 times. Jackson managed a PAM of 6.1. Jackson hit all 12 of his free throws. If he had not taken any shots from the floor, Jackson would have ended up with a PAM of 6.5, so his shots from the floor on the whole weren't much of a problem for Texas. It was the free throws. Jackson struggled with turnovers in the first half, but he played much better in the second half. He is a really tough player to contain.
Texas actually played pretty well offensively. They took care of the ball, with turnovers in only 16% of their possessions. Texas' true shooting percentage of 0.585 was spread pretty evenly over all of the players, as everyone who played significant minutes made positive contributions on the PAM statistic that I track.
Texas also defended well against Perry Jones, who ended up with a PAM of -6.2.
Yet another game where Texas failed to do the job on the defensive glass.
0 recs | 11 comments
Couple more thoughts on Baylor...
One of the things I wrote about was Texas’ seemingly defensive switch from the first half to the second. In the first, it looked like they were throwing two bodies on Jackson to trap him on the perimeter, but I didn’t feel like they did that the first half.
I thought Holmes and Wangmene did a really good job of tag-teaming Jones and Acy in the first half. Fatigue was probably a factor for Holmes in the second; it’s hard to keep up with Acy’s manchild body for 40 minutes.
Baylor switching to Deuce Bello and AJ Walton in the late game also helped neutralize J’Covan and Kabongo.
jc25 - February 22, 2012
still depressed.....
Ohio Horn - February 22, 2012
Chapman is a high effort guy
But we can’t have games where he has zero rebounds and a guy like Acy nabs 16. That’s just killer.
TheElusiveShadow - February 22, 2012
Simply Don't Deserve NCAA's
I love my Longhorns. I love them despite the criticisms I have of Barnes for recruiting a constant pipeline of one-and-dones, not allowing for any true team to develop or take shape that can contest for championships. And I’m from the school of thought that tough love, despite the pain it involves, is often the best way to make lasting improvements.
The simple fact is these Horns haven’t done a single thing to earn a NCAA tournament bid this season. If they end up going it will be because they pull off the upset of the millennium in Lawrence (and not choke against TTU or OU) or pull off the upset of the young century by running through the Big 12 tournament with wins over Baylor, KU and/or Mizzou.
If this Texas team makes the NCAA’s after losing to KU, finishing with a losing conference record followed by a quick exit from the Big 12 tournament it will diminish what the big dance is all about and what it takes to get there. Aside from the AQ teams I doubt a single team in history has ever been called on Selection Sunday without a single quality win (Temple minus their stars, KSU & ISU at home don’t count in my book), that’s not peaking with a late season winning streak and has ugly non-conference losses to boot (NC St and Oregon St). No, this team has played their way down to the NIT’s. The second half against Baylor was their moment to show they wanted it and deserved to be called to the tournament.
All that said, maybe this is the tough love they need to develop into a team. MAYBE no one bolts to the NBA this time around and the additional time together helps them develop into a championship caliber team in future years. They’ve got plenty of new talent coming in to be excited about. But not having to thrust it into starting roles in leadership could do wonders to reset a program that has fallen into a bad cycle. Like North Carolina a few years ago the NIT’s could be the best thing for them – if they bother to show up for it and go deep to the championship game like NC did (and Baylor the year before). An early flame out from the NIT’s would expose a complete lack of heart and desire to win in this young crew that won’t bode well for 2012, either.
So, while I’m still pulling for the Longhorns to do something they haven’t shown they can do once this season – win a big game – in the remaining ones, I fully expect them to be right where they deserve to be, the NIT’s. And I’ll be curious to see how they approach that tournament, will they lay down in self-pity and doubt, or will they rise up and show they want and expect more of themselves by playing for the Kids Kup in the MSG?
RMHorn - February 22, 2012
No Disrespect to TMBRA
Joking about the NIT tournament championship calling it the Kids Kup didn’t mean to disrespect the Texas Mountain Bike Racing Association’s trophy!
RMHorn - February 22, 2012
If Texas beats Tech and OU
Then they won’t have a losing conference record.
Your statement that they don’t deserve it, while it may be in fact be correct, doesn’t seem to take in to account how weak the other bubble teams are as well. Texas does deserve it, if their resume is one of the top 68.
The tournament, and what it takes to get there was diminished when they expanded a few years ago because Syracuse didn’t get in two years in a row. However, we shouldn’t just not be allowed to go because we’re not as good as we’re used to, or not as good as we could be.
Also, we’re going to beat Tech and OU, and then Baylor in the Big 12 tournament, and then deserve to get in anyway.
hayzer13 - February 22, 2012
Other Bubbles Have Signature Wins
Or are peaking at the right time of year. We don’t. But you’re right, 9-9 isn’t losing – or winning. But I’m not sure at this point even a lone win over Baylor in the conference tournament does it. Maybe a lone win over Mizzou or KU does there, but Baylor won’t be enough at this stage, IMHO. If you’re right, great, I just don’t see it.
RMHorn - February 22, 2012 via mobile
Only shot at winning at KU...
is that they’ve already wrapped up #1 seed and conference crown before we play to end the regular season……and just pray they are asleep at the wheel in that matchup.
silky51 - February 22, 2012
Big 12 tournament
Looking at the remaining schedules for Texas, ISU, and KSU, it looks like Texas will probably finish 6th in the regular season. That means they don’t play in day one of the tournament but will be matched on day 2 vs the 3 seed (probably Baylor). This means that Texas probably will not win one game in the Big 12 tournament.
Kafka - February 22, 2012
hard to beat a team 3 teams in one season...
at least that’s what I’ve been taught, lol.
silky51 - February 22, 2012
Good point
Kafka - February 22, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.