The Longhorns celebrated the end of a brutal six-game stretch with a comfortable 74-57 victory over visiting Texas Tech, improving their record to 14-9 overall, 4-6 in Big 12 play. Texas started fast, opening the game on a 7-0 run that they quickly extended to a 17-4 lead just over five minutes into the game, and the Red Raiders were never able to make a game of it. The Longhorns led 40-25 at half and built a commanding 22-point lead midway through the second half before coasting in to the finish line.
Three Loghorns scored in double digits, led by Clint Chapman, whose 20 points and 9 rebounds were both team highs, while J`Covan Brown and Sheldon McClellan added 17 points apiece. The strong scoring from Chapman and Brown is most welcome, of course, but it was McClellan's improved contributions that are the most important to the Longhorns down the stretch. After struggling with all-around consistency, and especially with his defense, McClellan had steadily seen both his production and minutes sink throughout much of January. But Rick Barnes gave him the starting nod tonight (apparently at least in part because Julien Lewis was returning from an uncle's funeral), and McClellan immediately and forcefully responded.

On Texas' very first possession McClellan attacked Ty Nurse with his dribble, creating space and connecting on a pretty shot close in. Again on UT's second possession McClellan attacked with his dribble, sucking the defense in towards the paint before kicking it out to Myck Kabongo, who drilled a three. Two possessions later, McClellan confidently stepped into and drained a 15-footer to put Texas up 9-2, and shortly after that he was the offensive catalyst yet again when he penetrated the lane and lofted a floater that bounced short off the rim but fell into the arms of Jonathan Holmes, who was free for the offensive rebound thanks to the defensive attention drawn by McClellan.
All told, Texas' talented freshman wing opened the first five minutes of the game with 6 points on 3-4 shooting, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, and another unofficial assist created by his attacking penetration. He finished the game a solid 7-11 from the floor, including 1 of 2 from beyond the arc, providing the scoring offense this Texas team desperately needs him to provide. It's not at all impossible for the Longhorns to win 6 of their final 8 games, but it's hard to imagine them doing so without McClellan taking a step forward to become a more consistently productive scorer. In that regard, tonight's effort was a most welcome one, and particularly encouraging because of the assertiveness McClellan demonstrated in attacking the defense and looking for points. He's ridiculously athletic and deceptively difficult for a defender to stay with, but he's still scratching the surface in terms of harnessing that ability and learning how to consistently channel it as a scorer. More, more, more please, Sheldon.
Beyond the important scoring contribution from McClellan, it was good to see the team as a whole playing with focus and taking care of details. Texas was strong on the glass at both ends of the floor, scooping up 16 of their own 31 misses, while limiting Tech to just 10 second chances on their 32 missed shots. Likewise, the Longhorns did a good job playing purposefully and under control -- giving up 11 turnovers to the Red Raiders' 14. Texas outplayed Texas Tech in the paint, in transition, on team defense, and in running offense and -- especially -- working hard to get to the line, dominating the contest from the stripe by connecting on 25 of 31 attempts while Tech managed just 14 free throws, making 9.
You can't get too carried away with a home win over a team as young, raw, and, well, winless, as Texas Tech. I expected about a 20-point margin of victory, and that's more or less what we saw. Even in context, we saw some encouraging and potentially important things tonight, and now it's all about carrying it over and into a more difficult challenge.
Texas will get that challenge in two short days, as they travel to College Station for Big Monday. Following their loss today in Manhattan, the Aggies now sit at just 3-7 in conference play, but A&M is 3-2 at Reed Arena, with wins over Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State, bracketed by a blowout loss to Iowa State and a narrow 3-point defeat to Baylor last week. As offensively inconsistent as are the Aggies, this year's trip to Reed looks more winnable than normally seems likely in College Station, but even amidst such a disappointing season the Longhorns can bet that both the team and fans will be eager to win the final meeting at their place.
Hook 'em
0 recs | 13 comments
Alright
Is Mr. Tucker in the house? Time to ruin the aggy going away party again.
HookemHouston - February 4, 2012 via mobile
How'd Kabongo look?
Longhorn11 - February 4, 2012 via mobile
McClellan
Not that hard to have a good game against Tech. What we need to see is that level of play against better opponents. We also need to see him continue to deliver offense when having to defend a key man. His D has improved some, but I suspect that’s why Lewis starts.
Caradoc - February 5, 2012
+1
following - February 5, 2012
Was the attendance any better at this game?
HookemHouston - February 5, 2012
Need to find a way to take care of the Ags on Monday night
A win there can help us creep back into the Tourney mix.
junglerules - February 5, 2012
we gotta win
a loss would really hurt. (will half their starting line-up be on the bench w/injuries again?)
Mizzou took Kansas down a Big 12 notch last night (what a game!)
following - February 5, 2012
Nice To See Chap Have a Good Game
I have always felt he had the talent if given a chance to play. Unfortunately Barnes wasted 3 of his 4 years of eligibility by not giving him a chance. One bad shot, one turnover, back to the bench. “Death by Suffocation” as has been mentioned in the past.
Bottom line is that I think he needed a chance to get on the court and stay on it to gain experience and confidence. How else do you explain going from a career 39% FT shooter to 82% this year? And it is water under the bridge now but I think if he had been given a chance to play two years ago he would have provided more of an overall contribution than Pittman did.
gcinthewoods - February 5, 2012
Agreed
Still remember the Kansas State game of that year. We were trailing not sure by how much, we inserted Chapman and he scored 2 layups on back to back plays. I have absolutely no idea why Matt Hill got playing time over him, Chapman has been way ahead of Hill in just about every category since coming to the 40 acres( especially on offense). Also, I’m glad he’s getting a chance now, just wondering what could’ve been. That season, Wangmene played nearly 3 times the minutes (230 to 80) in twice the games ( 30 to 16). There is no comparison as to which of these players has actually produced.
Mclovin1035 - February 5, 2012
more game time = more prime time from Chappy
still needs to prove himself against the premiere big men in the league, though.
(& playing time?? i concede your arguments, but Thomas Robinson only played 14 minutes a game last year. at some places, guys just aren’t gonna play until their Junior or Senior years).
If Chapman & McClellan keep playing well, we could finish the season really strong.
following - February 5, 2012
Yep
Not saying that Chap is a premiere big man or NBA material, just that I think he could have provided more of a contribution to UT BB over 4 years if he had been given more of an opportunity. As noted above, 80 minutes of PT in 09/10 is the equivalent of 2 full games for an entire season. It was disappointing not seeing him get a chance, especially over the back half of that season when we were getting very little contribution from Pittman.
And yes, hopefully all these guys will continue to improve and a strong finish is still possible. Wasn’t it A&M a few years ago that started Big12 very poorly and then ran off a bunch of consecutive wins at the end to make the tournament. Bottom line is that there is still reason for some optimism.
gcinthewoods - February 5, 2012
Sorry, I have to disagree
Watching Chapman play across his first three years was a torturous exercise. His feet were slow, his body was weak, and his mind was even weaker. Moreover, we were busy winning gobs of games with better players. Frankly, I wouldn’t have played Chapman any more than Barnes did, either. To your point about opportunity, I certainly agree that the more Chapman’s played this year the more comfortable and productive he’s become, but I attribute a good chunk of the readiness portion of that to the redshirt year he took last season in order to work exclusively on building his body strength. Prior to that, he was not good enough or strong enough to play meaningful minutes. I’m sorry, but he just wasn’t. Every minute he was on the floor was excruciating.
Peter Bean - February 5, 2012
Guess We'll Never Know
What coulda, shoulda, etc. But even to your point that he was not ready, why did he not get more PT in the cream puff games? Certainly it seems like a player who was one of the top recruits in the country should have logged more than the equiv. of 2 games in an entire season, especially when half the schedule is non-conf record padding games. But like I said, all that is water under the bridge now.
One thing I don’t know that I agree on is the extra strength issue. I can’t believe that after 3 years working under Todd Wright that he became any stronger in a 4th year. Maybe that would have helped a kid just coming out of high school who hadn’t had extensive strength and conditioning, but after 3 full years I don’t see how there can be a big change. Everyone knows that he was red-shirted because of no big men on the roster this year even though the “building strength” argument was used. I just don’t think he is any stronger this year than any of the previous years but that is just my opinion.
gcinthewoods - February 5, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Burnt Orange Nation to post a comment.